期刊文献+

术后即刻FFR对PCI患者预后的预测价值 被引量:1

Prognostic value of FFR immediately after PCI for prognosis of PCI patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)术后即刻心肌血流储备分数(FFR)对患者预后的预测价值。方法纳入2014年3月—2017年12月在本院行PCI治疗的支架置入患者(200例)。术后进行1年随访(电话和门诊复查),根据随访期间有无发生主要心血管不良事件(MACE)将患者分为MACE组和非MACE组。进行单因素和多元Logistic回归分析PCI术后MACE影响因素,建立受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)分析FFR的预测价值并绘制Kaplan-Meier曲线验证,分析术后FFR的影响因素。结果经过1年随访,MACE组31例,非MACE组169例。MACE组患者术后FFR显著低于非MACE组(t=6.316,P=0.000),MACE组糖尿病、高血压与高血脂患者的占比明显高于非MACE组(P<0.05)。多因素分析显示高血压、糖尿病、高血脂、术后FFR为MACE的影响因素。ROC曲线显示术后FFR对MACE有较好预测价值(P=0.000),其中术后FFR=0.868为最佳临界值。生存分析显示术后FFR≥0.868组患者MACE发生迟于术后FFR<0.868组(Log-rank P=0.008);多因素分析显示术后FFR影响因素有右侧冠状动脉靶血管累及、术前FFR值和支架直径(P=0.022,0.004,0.038,均<0.05)。结论术后FFR对PCI预后有较好预测价值,术后FFR≥0.868组患者MACE发生时间迟于术后FFR<0.868组。右侧冠状动脉靶血管累及、术前FFR值与支架直径是术后FFR的影响因素。 Aim To explore the predictive value of fractional flow reserve(FFR)immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI)on the prognosis of patients.Methods This study included patients(200 cases)who underwent PCI treatment in our hospital from March 2014 to December 2017.A 1-year follow-up(re-examination by telephone and outpatient)was carried out after the operation,and the patients were divided into MACE group and non-MACE group according to whether there were major adverse cardiovascular events(MACE)during the follow-up period.Perform univariate and multiple Logistic regression analysis to analyze the influencing factors of MACE after PCI,establish receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC curve)to analyze the predictive value of FFR and draw Kaplan-Meier curve to verifyit,and analyze the influencing factors of postoperative FFR.Results After 1 year of follow-up,31 cases were in the MACE group and 169 cases were in the non-MACE group.The postoperative FFR of MACE group was significantly lower than that of non-MACE group[t=6.316,P=0.000].The proportion of patients with diabetes,hypertension and hyperlipidemia in MACE group was significantly higher than that of non-MACE group(P<0.05).Multivariate analysis showed that hypertension,diabetes,hyperlipidemia,and postoperative FFR were the influencing factors of MACE.ROC curve showed that postoperative FFR had a better predictive value for MACE(P=0.000),and postoperative FFR=0.868 was the best critical value.Survival analysis showed that the incidence of MACE in the postoperative FFR≥0.868 group was later than that in the postoperative FFR<0.868 group(Log-rank P=0.008);multivariate analysis showed that postoperative FFR influencing factors included right coronary target vessel involvement and preoperative FFR value and stent diameter(P=0.022,0.004,0.038,all P<0.05).Conclusions Postoperative FFR has a good predictive value for the prognosis of PCI.The incidence of MACE in the postoperative FFR≥0.868 group is later than that in the postoperative FFR<0.868 group.Involvement of the right coronary target vessel,preoperative FFR value and stent diameter are the influencing factors of postoperative FFR.
作者 何志英 王晓梅 HE Zhiying;WANG Xiaomei(Department of Cardiology,West Hospital of Qingdao Municipal Hospital Group,Qingdao,Shandong 266071,China;Department of Cadre Health Care,the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University,Jinzhou,Liaoning 121000,China)
出处 《中国动脉硬化杂志》 CAS 2020年第11期991-996,共6页 Chinese Journal of Arteriosclerosis
关键词 血流储备分数 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 预测 blood flow reserve fraction percutaneous coronary intervention prediction
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献90

  • 1Collaborative Research Group of Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction.重组葡激酶与重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗急性心肌梗死的随机多中心临床试验[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(8):691-696. 被引量:43
  • 2Pijls NH. Fractional flow reserve to guide coronary revascularization. Circ J, 2013, 77: 561-569.
  • 3Nam CW, Rha SW, Koo BK, et al. Usefulness of coronary pressure measurement for functional evaluation of drug-eluting stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol, 2011, 107: 1783-1786.
  • 4Muller O, Mangiacapra F, Ntalianis A, et al. Long-term follow-up after fractional flow reserve-guided treatment strategy in patients with an isolated proximal left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2011, 4 : 1175-1182.
  • 5Hamilos M, Muller O, Cuisset T, et al. Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided treatment in patients with angiographically equivocal left main coronary artery stenosis. Circulation, 2009, 120:1505-1512.
  • 6Bavry AA, Elgendy IY, Petersen JW. Outcomes associated with fractional flow-guided revascularization: A Meta-analysis. Clin Cardiol, 2014, 37: 610-617.
  • 7Li J, Elrashidi MY, Flammer AJ, et al. Long-term outcomes of fractional flow reserve-guided vs. angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in contemporary practice. Eur Heart J, 2013, 34: 1375-1383.
  • 8De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, et al. Fractional flow reserve- guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med, 2012, 367 : 991-1001.
  • 9Lindstaedt M, Yazar A, Germing A, et al. Clinical outcome in patients with intermediate or equivocal left main coronary artery disease after deferral of surgical revascularization on the basis of fractional flow reserve measurements. Am Heart J, 2006, 152 : 151-156.
  • 10Elgendy IY, Conti CR, Bavry AA. Fractional flow reserve: an updated review. Clin Cardiol, 2014, 37 : 371-350.

共引文献2372

同被引文献14

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部