期刊文献+

颅内压监测下阶梯减压技术在重型颅脑创伤治疗中的作用 被引量:20

Application of stepwise decompression technique under intracranial pressure monitoring in severe traumatic brain injury
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨颅内压监测下阶梯减压技术在重型颅脑创伤(sTBI)治疗中的作用。方法回顾性分析2018年1月至2019年7月于内蒙古自治区人民医院神经外科接受手术治疗的47例sTBI患者的临床资料,格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)为3~8分。其中21例采用颅内压监测下阶梯减压技术,26例采用常规大骨瓣减压技术。术后评估患者的GCS、手术时长、入住神经重症监护室(NICU)时长、颞肌厚度、甘露醇使用情况及术后3个月的格拉斯哥预后评级(GOS)。结果颅内压监测下阶梯减压组与常规大骨瓣减压组术后24 h GCS分别为(6.7±1.8)分、(5.6±1.5)分;术后24 h CT显示蝶鞍层面颞肌厚度分别为(1.19±0.33)cm、(1.43±0.41)cm,其与术前的差值分别为(0.12±0.07)cm、(0.38±0.14)cm;甘露醇应用时间分别为(4.7±1.4)d、(9.4±2.0)d,应用剂量分别为(500±137)ml/d、(1250±283)ml/d;入住NICU时间分别为(10.7±2.3)d、(17.9±2.0)d。两组上述指标比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。手术时间分别为(120.0±12.3)min和(115.0±13.5)min,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后3个月GOSⅠ~Ⅲ级(预后不良)者分别占34.4%(7/21)、65.4%(17/26),Ⅳ~Ⅴ级(预后良好)者分别占65.6%(14/21)、34.6%(9/26),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论颅内压监测下阶梯减压技术在sTBI患者手术救治中,可更好地控制术中脑膨出、急性脑肿胀的发生,缓解颅内高压,缩短NICU入住时间,减少脱水剂用量和手术并发症,改善患者的预后。 Objective To investigate the effect of stepwise decompression technique under intracranial pressure monitoring in severe traumatic brain injury(sTBI).Methods The clinical data of 47 patients[GCS(Glasgow coma scale)score:3-8 points]with sTBI who underwent surgery at Department of Neurosurgery,Inner Mongolia People′s Hospital from January 2018 to July 2019 were retrospectively analyzed.Among those,the stepwise decompression technique was applied in 21 patients under intracranial pressure monitoring,and 26 patients underwent conventional large bone flap decompression.We evaluated the postoperative GCS score,operation duration,length of stay at neurological intensive care unit(NICU),temporal muscle thickness,usage of mannitol and GOS score at 3 months post surgery.Results The 24 h postoperative GCS scores were 6.7±1.8 points and 5.6±1.5 points in the group of stepwise decompression under intracranial pressure monitoring and the group of conventional large bone flap decompression,respectively.The 24 h postoperative CT showed that the temporal muscle thickness at the sella level was 1.19±0.33 cm and 1.43±0.41 cm in stepwise decompression group and conventional group respectively,and their differences from preoperative conditions were 0.12±0.07 cm and 0.38±0.14 cm,respectively.In stepwise decompression group and conventional group,the usage duration of mannitol was 4.7±1.4 d and 9.4±2.0 d,and the dosage was 500±137 ml/d and 1250±283 ml/d,respectively;the length of stay at NICU was 10.7±2.3 d and 17.9±2.0 d,respectively.Those inter-group differences as above were all significant(all P<0.05).The operation duration was 120.0±12.3 min and 115.0±13.5 min in stepwise decompression and conventional groups respectively,and there was no significant difference(P>0.05).At 3-month postoperative follow-up in stepwise decompression and conventional groups,the GOS(Glasgow outcome scale)gradeⅠ-Ⅲ(poor outcomes)accounted for 34.4%(7/21)and 65.4%(17/26)respectively,gradeⅣ-Ⅴ(good outcomes)accounted for 65.6%(14/21)and 34.6%(9/26)respectively,and both differences between the two groups were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion In the surgical treatment of sTBI patients,stepwise decompression under intracranial pressure monitoring could help better control the occurrence of encephalocele and acute brain swelling during operation,relieve high intracranial pressure,shorten the length of stay at NICU,reduce the amount of dehydrate agent and complications,and improve the outcomes of patients.
作者 赵卫平 邢栋 孙鹏 杨文博 苏宁 王忠 张瑞剑 Zhao Weiping;Xing Dong;Sun Peng;Yang Wenbo;Su Ning;Wang Zhong;Zhang Ruijian(Department of Neurosurgery,Inner Mongolia People′s Hospital,Inner Mongolia Clinical Medical College of Inner Mongolia Medical University,Hohhot 010017,China)
出处 《中华神经外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2020年第10期1017-1020,共4页 Chinese Journal of Neurosurgery
基金 内蒙古医科大学科技百万工程项目(YKD2016KJBW030) 内蒙古自治区关键技术攻关项目(2019GG051)。
关键词 颅脑损伤 神经外科手术 颅内压监测 阶梯减压技术 Craniocerebral trauma Neurosurgical procedures Intracranial pressure monitoring Stepwise decompression techniques
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献59

  • 1张赛,只达石.努力改进我国颅脑创伤急救体系及监测技术[J].中华神经外科杂志,2005,21(4):195-196. 被引量:56
  • 2毛阿燕,雷海潮.我国大型医用设备的配置及管理发展状况研究[J].中国医疗器械信息,2005,11(4):3-7. 被引量:26
  • 3张建永,刘保华,陆海,袁璞.标准大骨瓣减压术后颅腔容积代偿能力的研究[J].临床神经外科杂志,2007,4(2):76-78. 被引量:25
  • 4江基尧.介绍一种国外常用颅脑外伤标准大骨瓣[J].中华神经外科杂志,1998,14:381-381.
  • 5Cooper D J, Rosenfeld JV, Murray L, et al. Decompressive cra- niectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med,2011, 364 : 1493-1502.
  • 6Bullock RM, Chesnut R, Ghajar J. et al. Surgical management oftraumatic parenchymal lesion. Neurosurgery, 2006,58 : $25-$46.
  • 7Taylor A, Butt W, Rosenfeld J, et al. A randomized trial of very early decompressive craniectomy in children with traumatic brain injury and sustained intracranial hypertension. Childs Nerv Syst, 2001,17 : 154-162.
  • 8Huang YH, Lee TC, Lee TH, et al. Thirty-day mortality in traumatically brain-injured patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy. J Neurosurg,2013,118 : 1329-1335.
  • 9Bullock R, Golek J, Blake G. Traunmtic intracerebral hematoma- Which patients should undergo surgical evacuation? CT scan features and ICP monitoring as a basis for decision making. Surg Neurol, 1989,32 : 181-187.
  • 10Katayama Y, Tsubokawa T, Miyazaki S, et al. Edema fluid for- mation within contused brain tissue as a cause of medically uncontrollable elevation of intracranial pressure: The role of surgical therapy. Acta Neurochir (Wicn), 1990, 51 (Suppl) : 308 -310.

共引文献175

同被引文献207

引证文献20

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部