期刊文献+

鲁本斯《穿朝鲜服饰的男子》新探

A New Exploration of Man in North Korean Costume Drawn by Rubens
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在《穿朝鲜服饰的男子》画中人物身份的相关研究中,大多数观点从欧洲与朝鲜或明朝的交流这一角度将其视为“朝鲜人”或“中国商人”,并指出画中服饰包含了“朝鲜”和“明朝”两种元素,但实际上画中服饰的这种复杂性是源于朝鲜与明朝的朝贡关系。通过梳理两国的服饰交流史料,将画中人物所穿着的头冠、褡护、贴里等与朝鲜、明朝的服饰作详细对比可以发现这些服饰具有相似性,因此推断画中的服饰为朝鲜与明朝交流的混合产物,所以应将画中人物视为身份模糊的“亚洲人”。 With regard to the identity of the figure in Man in North Korean Costume,it has been held by the many that the man is a Korean or Chinese businessman from the perspective of the communication between Europe and North Korea or China in the Ming Dynasty(1368-1644)and that the costume in the painting contains two elements,North Korean and Ming Dynasty.However,in fact,the complexity of the costume originated from the paying-tribute between North Korea and China in the Ming Dynasty.Through analyzing the historical records of the costume of the two countries and comparing the crowns,guards,and underwear worn by the figure with the costume of North Korean and the Ming Dynasty,it can be found that these costumes are with similarity.Therefore,it can concluded that the costume in the painting is a mixed product of the exchanges between North Korea and China in the Ming Dynasty.Thus,the character in the painting should be an“Asian”with ambiguous identity.
作者 梁喆 张紫嫣 唐卫萍 LIANG Zhe;ZHANG Zi-yan;TANG Wei-ping(Institute of Arts Education,Hangzhou Normal University,Hangzhou 311121,China)
出处 《美育学刊》 2020年第6期86-94,共9页 Journal of Aesthetic Education
关键词 《穿朝鲜服饰的男子》 身份 服饰 交流 Man in North Korean Costume identity costume communication
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献26

  • 1特木勒.北元与高丽的外交:1368年~1369年[J].中国边疆史地研究,2000,10(2):75-78. 被引量:5
  • 2刘忠民.陕西洛川县潘窑科村宋墓清理简报[J].考古与文物,2004(4):26-28. 被引量:5
  • 3葛兆光.大明衣冠今何在[J].史学月刊,2005(10):41-48. 被引量:27
  • 4(后晋)刘啕.旧唐书[M].北京:中华书局,1975..
  • 5黄能福、陈娟娟、黄钢编著《服饰中华》第二卷,清华大学出版社,2011年出版.
  • 6Ahn In - sil《 Reconstruction of Men Robe in the Goryeo Period Based on the 13th century: Yosen-Cheollik and Dappo》,载《丝绸之路与元代艺术国际学术讨论会论文集》,艺纱彰服饰出版(香港),2005年出版.
  • 7《北京文物精粹大系·织绣卷》,北京出版集团.2001出版.
  • 8《洛阳道北元墓发掘简报》,载《文物》,文物出版社,1999年第2期.
  • 9Thomas W. Lentz and Glenn D lowry,Ti- mur and Princely version:persian art and culture in the fif- teenth century,the Metropolitan Museum of Art , 1989.
  • 10(汉)刘熙.(清)王先谦撰集.释名疏证补[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1989.

共引文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部