滥用市场支配地位诉讼举证责任研究——基于20份判例的实证分析

Research on the Burden of Proof in the Lawsuit of Abusing the Dominant Market Position:Empirical Analysis Based on 20 Cases

滥用市场支配地位诉讼作为具有代表性的一类反垄断诉讼,目前的司法现状不容乐观。对20份滥用市场支配地位行为的裁判文书进行了分析,发现存在举证责任分配不合理、证明标准过高、相关市场界定方法单一、缺乏与反垄断执法机构的衔接等问题。破解滥用市场支配地位诉讼举证责任的困境,需要合理分配举证责任、引入优势证据证明标准、对相关市场进行综合界定、加强法院与反垄断执法机构的合作。

Abuse of dominant market position litigation as a representative class of anti-monopoly litigation,the current judicial situation is not optimistic.Through analysis of 20 judgment documents of abusing market dominant position,it is found some problems,such as unreasonable distribution of burden of proof,too high standard of proof,single method of defining relevant market,lack of connection with anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies,etc.In order to solve the dilemma of the burden of proof in the lawsuit of abusing the dominant position of the market,it is necessary to improve it from the aspects of reasonable distribution of the burden of proof,introduction of the standard of proof of preponderant evidence,comprehensive definition of the relevant market,and strengthening the cooperation between the court and the anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies.