期刊文献+

负压封闭引流技术在骨盆周围创面治疗中的应用效果分析

Analysis on the Effect of Vacuum Sealing Drainage in the Treatment of Wounds around Pelvis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨负压封闭引流技术治疗骨盆周围创面的临床疗效。方法给予2016年6月至2019年6月徐州仁慈医院收治的36例骨盆周围组织损伤患者负压封闭引流技术治疗局部创面,待创面肉芽组织生长良好后直接缝合或行植皮、皮瓣转移封闭创面,观察治疗效果。结果 36例患者创面肉芽组织生长良好时间为(14.2±3.6) d,行游离皮片移植修复者14例、远处皮瓣转移修复者6例、局部皮瓣转移修复者16例,术后治疗(29.5±2.5) d后皮瓣成活良好,创面完全愈合。结论负压封闭引流技术可有效促进骨盆周围创面的再生修复,为后期的创面封闭奠定良好的基础,疗效显著,临床应用价值较高。 Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of vacuum sealing drainage in the treatment of wounds around pelvis.Methods Thirty-six patients with wounds around pelvis,admitted to Xuzhou Renci Hospital from June 2016 to June 2019,were treated with vacuum sealing drainage.After granulation tissues grew well,the wounds were sealed by suturing,skin grafting or flap transfer.The treatment effect was observed.Results The time for wounds to have well-grown granulation tissues in the 36 patients was(14.2±3.6)d.14 cases were given free skin flap grafting,6 cases underwent distal skin flap transfer,and the other 16 cases received local skin flap transfer.The skin flaps survived well(29.5±2.5)days after the operations,and the wounds were healed completely.Conclusion Vacuum sealing drainage can effectively promote the regenerative repair of wounds around the pelvis,thus laying a good foundation for later wound closure,presenting a high value of clinical application.
作者 黄振 王朋 潘珍乙 董亮 苏建 徐能武 Huang Zhen;Wang Peng;Pan Zhenyi;Dong Liang;Su Jian;Xu Nengwu(Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery,Xuzhou Renci Hospital,Xuzhou City,Jiangsu 221004,China)
出处 《中国烧伤创疡杂志》 2020年第6期392-394,402,共4页 The Chinese Journal of Burns Wounds & Surface Ulcers
关键词 骨盆周围创面 负压封闭引流技术 创面 修复 Wound around pelvis Vacuum sealing drainage Wound Repair
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献84

  • 1刘旭盛.慢性创面的诊断与治疗进展[J].中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版),2013,8(6). 被引量:22
  • 2苏富才,李锋.应用负压封闭引流技术治疗四肢创伤复杂创面的临床效果分析[J].当代医药论丛,2014,12(4):98-99. 被引量:8
  • 3Orgill DP, Manders EK, Sumpio BE, et al. The mechanisms of action of vacuum assisted closure: more to learn. Surgery, 2009, 146( 1 ) :40-51.
  • 4Barnea Y, Carmeli Y, Kuzmenko B, et al. The establishment of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa-infected burn-wound sepsis model and the effect of imipenem treatment. Ann Plast Surg, 2006,56(6) : 674-679.
  • 5Lalliss SJ, Stinner D J, Waterman SM, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy reduces pseudomonas wound contamination more than Staphylococcus aureus. J Orthop Trauma, 2010,24 (9) : 598 -602.
  • 6Fleischmann W, Streeker W, Bombelli M, et al. Vacuum sealing as treatment of soft tissue damage in open fractures. Unfallchirurg, 1993.96 ( 9 ) :488-492.
  • 7l,avery I,A, Barnes SA, Keith MS, et al. Prediction of healing for postoperative diabetic foot wounds based on early wound area progression. Diabetes Care, 2008,31( 1 ) :26-29.
  • 8Kanakaris NK, Thanasas C, Keramaris N, et al. The efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy in the management of lower extremity trauma: review of clinical evidence. Injury, 2007,38 Suppl 5 :S9-18.
  • 9Armstrong DG, Lavery LA. Negative pressure wound therapy after partial dlabetie foot amputation: a multieentre, randomised controlled trial, Lancet, 2005,366 (9498) : 1704-1710.
  • 10Morykwas MJ, Argenta LC, Shelton-Brown El, el al. Vacuumassisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment:animal studies and basic foundation. Ann Plast Surg, 1997,38 (6) :553-562.

共引文献117

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部