期刊文献+

内部人的创新活动更为保守吗?——来自中国上市家族企业研发投入的经验证据 被引量:6

Are Insiders More Conservative in Innovation Activities?Evidence from R&D Investment of Chinese Listed Family Firms
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于社会情感财富理论(SEW),本文发现广义内部人无论在研发投入上,还是在研发成本会计处理上都比外部人更为保守,董事长兼任CEO则弱化了保守水平。进一步将广义内部人分为高、中、低程度三类,研究发现:(1)内部化程度与研发投入之间并非呈简单负相关,而是呈左高右低的不对称U形关系;(2)三类中只有高程度内部人偏向于采用更为保守抑或"实在"的会计处理方法;(3)董事长兼任CEO弱化了高、中程度内部人研发投入的保守水平,但同时也让高程度内部人在研发成本会计处理上不那么"实在"。因此,总体上家族企业内部人的创新活动比外部人更保守,但并非内部化程度越高研发投入就越低,相对而言,两职合一的高程度内部人反而是最进取的。因此强化家族成员在不同岗位历练,以及培育家族和企业的"主心骨",是当前强化家族企业创新活动的两个途径,中长期则需要向外部人员开放核心岗位。本文结论对国家创新驱动战略下激发家族企业创新活力具有一定启示意义。 This paper studies the influence of the chairman’s internalization degree on the accounting treatment method of R&D investment and R&D cost of family business.It finds that insiders in the broad sense are more conservative than outsiders in terms of R&D investment and accounting treatment of R&D costs,while the chairman and CEO weakens the conservative level.When the generalized insiders are further divided into three categories:high,medium and low degree,we find that:(1)There is not a simple negative correlation between the degree of internalization and R&D investment,but an asymmetric U-shaped relationship between the degree of internalization and R&D investment.(2)Only high-level insiders prefer to adopt more conservative or“real”accounting methods.(3)The chairman and CEO weakens the high-level and medium-sized insiders;meanwhile,it also makes the accounting treatment of R&D cost less“realistic”.The conclusion of this paper has certain policy implications for promoting the innovation activities of listed family firms:First,family members as core executives should follow the principle of internal promotion as far as possible.Family business is the double superposition of firm ecology and family ecology.Family members,especially the second generation members,can become more enterprising and“real”in the firm’s R&D decisionmaking.Second,in the short and medium term,it can moderately improve the degree of centralization of family business.It is an important way to accelerate the accumulation of personal authority and cultivate the“backbone”of the family and the firm as soon as possible through the combination of two positions,that is,family members concurrently serve as the chairman and the CEO,which is an important way to promote the innovation input of family firms.Third,in the medium and long term,it is one of the important and necessary ways for family firms to gradually open up the core management posts,and to introduce external professional managers as the chairman.The innovation of this paper is mainly reflected in the following three aspects:First,on the research object,this paper further expands the research on family business innovation from the firm and family level to the individual level of family members.Taking the degree of internalization as the main feature of individual executives as the entry point,this paper analyzes the influence of core executives on firm R&D activities,so as to provide a new perspective for understanding the innovation activities of family firms.Second,in the empirical method,the existing literature often uses the birth background,namely blood relationship and kinship,to identify whether the senior executives are family insiders.This paper measures the degree of internalization of senior executives based on the composite perspective of background and mode of employment,and divides them into four categories according to the degree of internalization from high to low.Third,in terms of theoretical expansion,this paper attempts to expand the social emotional wealth theory(SEW)in the Chinese context,trying to embed Fei Xiaotong’s“Difference-order Pattern”interpersonal relationship into this western imported theory,so as to further expand the scope of SEW theory to panfamily members,and enhance the interpretation of the theory in the local social context.
作者 王明琳 何秋琴 Wang Minglin;He Qiuqin(Economics and Management School,Hangzhou Normal University,Hangzhou 311121,China)
出处 《外国经济与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第12期104-118,共15页 Foreign Economics & Management
基金 国家社科基金一般项目(15BGL078)。
关键词 内部人 创新 社会情感财富 差序格局 家族企业 insiders innovation SEW Difference-order Pattern family firms
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献180

  • 1郭于华.农村现代化过程中的传统亲缘关系[J].社会学研究,1994(6):49-58. 被引量:177
  • 2王明琳,周生春.控制性家族类型、双重三层委托代理问题与企业价值[J].管理世界,2006,22(8):83-93. 被引量:157
  • 3李寿喜.产权、代理成本和代理效率[J].经济研究,2007,42(1):102-113. 被引量:411
  • 4杜正胜.传统家族试论[A].黄宽重,刘增贵.家族与社会[C].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,2005.1-87.
  • 5Berrone P, et al. Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: Do family controlled firms pollute less? [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2010,55 ( 1 ): 82-- 113.
  • 6Carney M. Corporate Governance and Competitive Advantage in Family-Controlled Firms[J].Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2005,29 (3) : 249--265.
  • 7Carroll A B. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance[J].Aeademy of management review, 1979,4(4) : 497-- 505.
  • 8Cennamo C, et al. Socioemotional wealth and proactive stakeholder engagement: Why family-controlled firms care more about their stakeholders[J].Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2012, 36(6): 1153 1173.
  • 9Chrisman J J, Chua J H and Litz R A. Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms.- Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence[J].Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2004,28(4) 335--354.
  • 10Chrisman J J, et al. Family involvement, family influence, and family-centered non-economic goals in small firms[J].Entrepreneur- ship Theory and Practice, 2012,36(2) : 267-- 293.

共引文献408

同被引文献100

引证文献6

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部