期刊文献+

科研诚信视角下的人文社科国际学术论文撤稿特征研究 被引量:8

Research on the Humanities and Social Sciences International Academic Papers Retraction Characteristics from the Perspective of Scientific Research Integrity
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的/意义]近年来",撤稿"成为揭露学术不端的一个重要途径,但是人文社会科学领域撤稿问题并未得到关注,因此有必要从科研诚信视角下开展研究。[方法/过程]文章利用撤稿观察数据库对国际人文社科领域的撤稿情况进行了统计及分析。[结果/结论]研究发现,2009年以来,国际人文社科撤稿数量迅速增长,学术不端是撤稿的主要原因;优质期刊和出版社撤稿数量和比例较高,发现问题和处理问题的能力更强;跨学科领域是撤稿问题的高发地带;批量撤稿通常与学术不端有关,部分作者学术不端行为有一定连续性;撤稿实施难度较大。建议重视人文社科领域撤稿现象,关注重点问题和领域,推进撤稿信息的规范、公开、共享,保护期刊撤稿积极性。 [Purpose/significance]In recent years,"retracted articles"have become an important way of exposing academic misconduct,but the issue of retractions was not stressed in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities(SSH).Therefore,it is necessary to conduct research from the perspective of research integrity.[Method/process]The retraction situation of SSH in the world was statistically analyzed by using the retraction watch database.[Result/conclusion]Since 2009,the number of retractions of SSH has increased rapidly,and academic misconduct is the main reason for the retractions;more retractions of high-quality journals and publishers reflect their stronger ability to find and deal with questionable articles;interdisciplinary fields are the high incidence area of retractions;batch retraction is usually related to academic misconduct,and the academic misconducts of some authors are continuous;it is difficult to retract articles.It is suggested that we should pay attention to retractions in SSH,keep an eye on the key issues and fields,promote the standardization,openness and sharing of the retraction information,and protect the enthusiasm of journal editorsonretractions.
作者 蒋颖 Jiang Ying(Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Evaluation Studies,CASS,Beijing,100732)
出处 《情报资料工作》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第6期63-70,共8页 Information and Documentation Services
关键词 撤稿研究 科研诚信 人文社会科学国际论文 studies on retractions research integrity articles in social sciences and humanities
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献24

  • 1Steen RG.Retractions in the scientific literature : do authors deliberately commit research fraud[J].J Med Ethics, 2011, 37 (2) :113-117.
  • 2Steen RG, Casadevall A, Fang FC.Why has the number of scientific retractions increased[J]?PLoS One, 2013, 8 (7) : e68397.
  • 3Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Akazhanov NA, et aI.Self-correction in biomedical publications and the scientific impact[J].Croat Med J, 2014, 55 (1) : 61-72.
  • 4Singh HP, Mahendra A, Yadav B, et aI.A comprehensive analysis of articles retracted between 2004 and 2013 from biomedical literature - a call for reforms[J].J Tradit Complement Med, 2014, 4 (3) : 136-139.
  • 5Fang FC, Casadevall A.Retracted science and the retraction index[J].Infect Immun, 2011, 79 (10) : 3855-3859.
  • 6Madlock-Brown CR, Eichmann D.The (lack of) impact of retraction citation networks[J].Sci Eng Ethics, 2015, 21 (1) :127-137.
  • 7Redman BK, Yarandi HN, Mera JF.Empirical developments in retraction[J].J Med Ethics, 2008, 34 (11 ) : 807-809.
  • 8Chen CM, Hu ZG, Milbank J, et aI.A visual analytic study of retracted articles in scientific literature[J].J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol, 2013, 64 (2) : 234-253.
  • 9Wager E, Williams P.Why and how do journals retract articles : An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008[J]. J Med Ethics, 2011, 37 (9) : 567-570.
  • 10Murat C,Faiho,RauIRE.Retraction rates are on the rise[J].EMBO Reports, 2008, 9 (1) : 2.

共引文献41

同被引文献112

引证文献8

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部