期刊文献+

反馈策略与反馈焦点对英语写作准确性的影响 被引量:5

The Effect of the Strategy and the Focus of Written Corrective Feedback on Writing Accuracy
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文探讨反馈策略与反馈焦点对时态错误、不完整句和粘连句的独立与组合效果。研究分为"前测—干预—即时后测—延迟后测"4个阶段,共有120名受试,分别接受直接聚焦反馈、直接非聚焦反馈、间接聚焦反馈和间接非聚焦反馈。实验结果表明:(1)直接反馈的即时效果要好于间接反馈;但间接反馈在时态错误上的长期效果要好于直接反馈;(2)聚焦反馈的即时与长期效果均要好于非聚焦反馈;(3)在组合效应方面,直接聚焦反馈、直接非聚焦反馈和间接聚焦反馈对粘连句和不完整句均有较好的即时与长期效果,直接聚焦反馈与间接聚焦反馈对时态错误有较好的即时效果,而只有间接聚焦反馈对时态有较好的长期效果。 The study explores the effects of the strategy and the focus of written corrective feedback on tense mistakes,fragments and runons.The research includes pre-test,treatment,immediate post-test and delayed post-test.120 subjects were divided into four groups,who received direct focused feedback,direct unfocused feedback,indirect focused feedback and indirect unfocused feedback respectively.Results reveal that direct feedback has a better immediate effect,while indirect feedback has a better long-term effect on tense mistakes.In addition,the immediate and long-term effects of focused feedback are better than those of unfocused feedback.Finally,direct focused feedback,direct unfocused feedback and indirect focused feedback have better immediate and long-term effect on runons and fragments.In terms of tense mistakes,direct focused feedback has a better immediate effect,while only indirect focused feedback is more effective in the long run.
作者 侯建东 Hou Jian-dong(Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin 300387,China;Beijing Foreign Studies University,Beijing 100089,China)
出处 《外语学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第6期67-73,共7页 Foreign Language Research
基金 天津市教委科研计划项目“基于自动作文评阅系统的纠正反馈有效性研究”(2019SK036)的阶段性成果。
关键词 反馈策略 反馈焦点 准确性 即时效果 长期效果 strategy of feedback focus of feedback immediate effect long-term effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献70

  • 1郭翠红,秦晓晴.国外二语学习者作文书面反馈研究——研究的视角及对大学英语作文评改的启示[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2006,29(5):59-63. 被引量:104
  • 2DeKeyser,R.The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition[J].Studiesin Second Language Acquisition,2000(4):499-533.
  • 3El-dali,H.M.Qualitative and quantitative analyses of L2 learners' performance in essay writing and two correction task:Insights from L2 acquisition research and cognitive psychology[J].Journal of English and Literature,2011(2):28-52.
  • 4Ellis,R.Epilogue:A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback[J].Studies in Second Language Acquisition,2010(2):335-349.
  • 5Hyland,F.Focusing on form:Student engagement with teacher feedback[J].System,2003(2):217-230.
  • 6Mackey,A.Feedback,noticing and instructed second language learning[J].Applied Linguistics,2006(3):405-430.
  • 7Qi,D.S.& Lapkin,S.Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage secind language writing task[J].Journal of Second Language Writing,2001(4):277-303.
  • 8Sachs,R.&Polio,C.Learners' uses of two types ofwritten feedback on a L2 writing revision task[J].Studies in Second Language Acquisition,2007(1):67-100.
  • 9Storch,N.& Wigglesworth,G.Learners' processing,uptake,and retention of corrective feedback on writing:Case studies[J].Studiesin Second Language Acquisition,2010(2):303-334.
  • 10Bitchener, J. Evidence in support of written corrective feedback [ J ]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2008, 17 (2): 102-118.

共引文献71

同被引文献43

引证文献5

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部