摘要
为了化解华人本土社会科学的“黄光国难题”,首先对中国传统学术的属性或旨趣做出一个总体性判断,即中西学术的总体差异是“治心之学”与“驭物之学”的区别,然后对作为中国文化思想内核的传统心学(为儒释道三家共通之处)进行批判地继承和创造性地诠释,从而发展出一套“全心心学”(简称“全心学”)。“全心学”试图融会中西相关理论思想——尤其是孟子与王阳明的心学思想以及西方心理学的相关理论——以使“天人合一”的精神境界与“天人两分”的科学思维能够在其中并行不悖、相辅相成。“全心学”的主要内容包括一个关于自我概念的“全心”模型以及“心理相映”“知行互证”和“尽心知理”三个命题,它可被视为一种全新的心学,是对黄光国所追求的“儒家思想的第三次现代化”的一种尝试。
In order to solve the“Hwang Kwang-Kuo Puzzle”of Chinese indigenous social science,we should first make a general judgment on the nature or purport of Chinese traditional learning,that is,the overall difference between Chinese and western learning is the difference between“governing the mind”and“controlling things”,and then critically inherit and create the traditional Xin Philosophy(the common ground of Confucianism,Buddhism and Taoism),the core of Chinese cultural thought,and thus develop a set of“Quan(tum)-Xin Philosophy”.The Quan(tum)-Xin Philosophy tries to integrate the relevant theories of China and the west,especially the thoughts of Mencius and Wang Yangming and the related theories of western psychology,so that the spiritual realm of“unity of heaven and man”and the scientific thinking of“separation of heaven and man”can go hand in hand and be supplementary to each other.The main content of“whole heart study”includes a“whole heart”model of self-concept and three propositions of“mutual reflection of psychology”,“mutual proof of knowledge and practice”and“knowledge of reason with all one s heart”.It can be regarded as a brand-new study of mind and an attempt to“the Third Modernization of Confucianism”pursued by Huang Guangguo.
出处
《中国文化与管理》
2020年第2期34-56,175,176,共25页
Chinese Culture and Management
关键词
中国
本土
社会科学
心学
慧商
全心
China
indigenous
social science
Xin Philosophy
Hui Shang
Quan(tum)-Xin