摘要
分享经济是一种具有颠覆性创新价值的经济形式,由此也产生了不同于传统交易中的损害赔偿责任问题,而《电子商务法》对平台经营者的资质审查义务和安全保障义务已难以适用。真正意义上的分享经济是要破除资质,让资源在多余和匮乏之间实现自由的动态平衡;但平台并不能因此逃避义务和责任,中立角色的公共性和利益分享都使得其责无旁贷。损害赔偿责任的配置问题不应以连带或补充做简单二分,应综合权衡平台角色、原因力、收益比例和创新价值这四个方面的因素。
The sharing economy is an economic model with subversive innovative value,and thus it also creates a problem of liability for damage compensation that is different from that in traditional transactions.However,the qualification review obligation and security obligation imposed by The E-Commerce Law on platform operators hardly apply to the sharing economy.The sharing economy in the true sense is precisely to get rid of qualifications and allow resources to achieve a free and dynamic balance.between excess and scarcity;however,the platform cannot evade obligations and responsibilities,for the publicity and benefit sharing of a neutral role make it duty-bound.The allocation of liability for damage compensation should not simply be categorized into either joint or supplement.Such four factors as platform role,causal power,revenue ratio and innovative value should be comprehensively weighed up.
出处
《江苏社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第6期131-137,I0004,I0005,共9页
Jiangsu Social Sciences
基金
作者主持的2019年江苏省社科基金项目“共享经济平台社会责任的法律规制研究”(19FXB007)的阶段性成果。