期刊文献+

视频平台用户生成内容投资和定价决策 被引量:16

User generated content investment and pricing decisions in online video markets
下载PDF
导出
摘要 平台管理者需要在考虑双边网络外部性的条件下对两边用户进行定价决策,除此之外.投资策略也愈显重要.文章以视频平台为对象,用博弈模型研究视频平台在两边定价和UGC(用户生成内容)投资策略.上的利益权衡.不同的内容来源具有不同的属性,UGC内容相对于版权视频对广告商的吸引力不同,从而影响平台的投资策略.考虑了3种情况:垄断、广告商多归属的寡头竞争以及广告商单归属的寡头竞争.研究提供了不同情况下视频平台的定价和UGC投资的决策指导,并比较了与传统市场的视角下决策的不同之处.结论显示不同的竞争条件下平台对于用户定价和UGC内容的投资策略如何受到UGC内容的特性以及平台间差异性的影响. Platform managers should consider the effects of two-sided network externalities when make pricing decisions for users on both sides. Besides,investment strategies are also essential to platforms. Focusing on the online video platforms,a game model is developed to investigate the trade-off between the strategies of twosided pricing and the investment of UGC( user-generated content). Different video contents exhibit different attributes. The UGC attracts advertisers differently compared with the copyright contents,as affects the investment strategy of the platform. The platforms’ joint-decision on pricing and UGC investment is studied. Three scenarios are considered: monopoly,duopoly with multi-homing advertisers,and duopoly with single-homing advertisers. Optimal decisions on two-sided pricing and UGC investment for each scenario are given,and are compared with those of traditional markets to explore the differences in terms of the decision-making. The results show how the platforms’ investment and pricing strategies are affected by the characteristics of UGC and by the differentiation between competing platforms.
作者 尹鹏 丁栋虹 豆国威 YIN Peng;DING Dong-hong;DOU Guo-wei(School of Management,University of Science and Technology of China,Hefei 230026,China;College of Management,Shenzhen University,Shenzhen 518061,China)
出处 《管理科学学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2020年第10期116-126,共11页 Journal of Management Sciences in China
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71701135).
关键词 双边市场 视频平台 UGC 定价 two-sided markets video platform UGC pricing
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献23

  • 1Rochet J, Tirole J. Platform competition in two-sided markets [ J ]. Journal of European Economic Association, 2003, 1: 990-1029.
  • 2Sujit Chakravorti, Roberto Roson. Platform competition in two-sided markets: The case of payment networks[ J ]. Review of Network Economics, 2006, 5 ( 1 ) : 118-143.
  • 3Manenti F M, Somma E. Plastic Clashes : Competition among Closed and Open System in the Credit Card Industry [ R ]. Working Paper, Berkeley: Berkeley Haas Business School at the University of California, 2002.
  • 4Armstrong M. Competition in two-sided markets[ J]. RAND Journal of Economics, 2006, 37: 668-691.
  • 5Ulrich K, Wright J. Price structure in two-sided markets: Evidence from the magazine industry[ J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2006, 24 : 1-28.
  • 6Rochet J, Tirole J. Cooperation among competitors : The economics of payment card associations [ J ]. Rand Journal of Economics, 2002, 33(4): 549-570.
  • 7Wright J. Optimal card payment system[J]. European Economic Review, 2003, 47: 587-612.
  • 8Schwartz M, Vincent D. Same price, cash or card: Vertical control by payment networks[ J ]. Review of Network Economics, 2006, 5(1) : 72 - 102.
  • 9Schmalensee R. Payment system and interchange fee [ J]. Journal of Industrial Economics, 2002, 2: 103-122.
  • 10Chang H H, Evan D. The competitive effects of the collective setting of interchange fees by payment card system[ J]. The Antitrust Bulletin Fall, 2000, 45: 641-677.

共引文献126

同被引文献129

引证文献16

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部