期刊文献+

重庆市某三甲综合医院住培医师评教结果分析 被引量:1

An Analysis of the Results of Evaluation on Education by Resident Doctors in a Top Three General Hospital in Chongqing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析住培医师对带教老师的评教结果,为提高住院医师规范化培训带教质量提供依据。方法采用统一制订的住院医师规范化培训带教老师教学质量评价表,对院内2017级、2018级、2019级在培的248名住培医师进行问卷调查,从带教态度、带教内容、带教能力、带教方法、带教效果五个维度进行评教结果分析。结果住培医师评教结果总分为(92.36±5.52)分,2019级住培医师对带教内容评分低于2017级、2018级(P<0.05);2018级住培医师对带教方法评分低于2017级、2019级(P<0.05);2017级住培医师对带教效果评分低于2018级、2019级(P<0.05)。结论住培医师评价带教老师更注重带教内容、带教方法和带教效果,不同年级住培医师对评教维度的关注点不同。 Objective To analyze the results of resident training doctors’evaluation of teaching teachers,so as to provide basis for improving the quality of resident standardized training.Methods A questionnaire survey was conducted among 248 residents in 2017,2018 and 2019 by adopting the standardized teaching quality evaluation form for resident doctors.The results were analyzed from five dimensions:teaching attitude,teaching content,teaching ability,teaching method and teaching effect.Results The total score of resident training physicians was(92.36±5.52).The score of 2019 resident training physicians on teaching content was lower than that of 2017 and 2018(P<0.05);the score of 2018 resident training physicians on teaching method was lower than that of 2017 and 2019(P<0.05);the score of 2017 resident training physicians on teaching effect was lower than that of 2018 and 2019(P<0.05).Conclusion Residents in training pay more attention to the content,method and effect of teaching,and different grades pay different attention to the dimension of teaching evaluation.
作者 文凤梅 周学刚 张巍琴 WEN Fengmei;ZHOU Xuegang;ZHANG Weiqin(Department of Science and Teaching,Chongqing Fuling Central Hospital,Chongqing 408099,China)
出处 《中国继续医学教育》 2020年第35期65-68,共4页 China Continuing Medical Education
基金 重庆市区域医学重点学科建设项目(zdxk201702)。
关键词 住培 师资 评教 住院医师 规范化培训 带教老师 教育 resident training teachers evaluation of teaching resident doctors standardized training teaching teachers education
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献116

  • 1赵澎,王引言,曲更宝,隋滨滨,马军,袁菁,程石.基于微信的移动式学习模式在研究生医学英语教学应用探讨[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2016,29(31):4-5. 被引量:5
  • 2任佰玲,胡志,周新发.住院医师规范化培训基地评价指标体系的研究[J].中国医院管理,2004,24(9):48-50. 被引量:24
  • 3蔡敏,张丽.大学生参与教师教学评价的调查研究[J].高等教育研究,2005,26(3):69-73. 被引量:86
  • 4Harvard University.About the Q-History of the Q [EB/OL].(2012-07-21)[2015-06-28].ht- tp://www.fas.harvard,edu/?evals/about.htm.
  • 5Harvard University.About the Q [EB/OL].(2011-04-25)[2015-06-28].http://www.fas.harvard,edu/?evals/about.htm.
  • 6Harvard University.About the Q-The Q Evalua- tion [EB/OL].(2013-04-21)[2015-06-28].http://www.fas.harvard,edu/?evals/about.htm.
  • 7Wilkinson J,Derek Bok Center.Interpreting Feedback and Evaluations [EB/OL].(2013-09-02)[2015-06-28].http://bokcenter.harvard,edu/interpreting-feedback-and-evaluations.
  • 8Derek Bok Center for Teaching and Learning.Cer- tificates of Excellence and Distinction in Teaching [EB/OL].(2013-05-17)[2015-06-28].http:// bokcenter.harvard,edu/certificates-excel- lence.
  • 9Derek Bok Center for Teaching and Learning.De- rek C.Bok Award [EB/OL].(2013-04-25)[2015-07-01].http://bokcenter.harvard,edu/ derek-c-bok-award.
  • 10Derek Bok Center for Teaching and Learning.Ear- ly Feedback Forms [EB/OL].(2013-07-08)[2015-07-01].http://bokcenter.harvard,edu/ early-feedback.

共引文献206

同被引文献12

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部