期刊文献+

血清CEA,CA19-9,CA125,CA153和CYFRA21-1检测对肺癌患者诊断的灵敏度及特异度 被引量:25

Sensitivity and specificity of serum CEA,CA19-9,CA125,CA153 and CYFRA21-1 in diagnosis of lung cancer patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察血清癌胚抗原(carcinoembryonic antigen,CEA),糖类抗原19-9(carbohydrate antigen 19-9,CA19-9),CA125,CA153及细胞角质蛋白片段19(cytokeratin fragment 19,CYFR A21-1)检测对肺癌患者诊断的灵敏度及特异度。方法:回顾性分析2016年1月至2017年6月在衡水市第二人民医院肿瘤科确诊的120例肺癌患者的临床资料,选择同期门诊体检的50例健康者作为对照组。对比各组血清CEA,CA19-9,CA125,CA153和CYFRA21-1水平。结果:肺癌组术前血清CEA,CA19-9,CA125,CA153和CYFR A21-1水平明显高于对照组(P<0.05);肺癌组术后1d,7d,1个月及3个月血清CEA,CA19-9,CA125,CA153和CYFRA21-1水平呈逐渐下降趋势(P<0.05)。腺癌患者术前CE A,CA125,CA153水平明显高于鳞癌患者(P<0.05),鳞癌患者术前CA19-9,CYFR A21-1水平明显高于腺癌患者(P<0.05)。Ⅲ期患者术前血清CEA,CA19-9,CA125,CA153和CYFRA21-1水平明显高于Ⅰ期+Ⅱ期(P<0.05)。有复发、转移患者术前血清CEA,CA19-9,CA125,CA153和CYFRA21-1水平显著高于无复发、转移患者(P<0.05)。ROC曲线结果显示血清CEA,CA19-9,CA125,CA153和CYFRA21-1及5个指标联合检测对肺癌诊断的曲线下面积分别为0.729,0.764,0.744,0.746,0.838,0.937,灵敏度分别为70.00,59.20,60.80,51.70,70.00,84.10,特异度分别为58.00,82.00,80.00,82.00,88.00,96.00。结论:血清CEA,CA19-9,CA125,CA153和CYFR A21-1联合检测可为肺癌的早期筛查、诊断及随访提供重要价值,联合测定又可提高诊断的灵敏度、特异度。 Objective: To observe the sensitivity and specificity of serum carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9(CA19-9), carbohydrate antigen 125(CA125), carbohydrate antigen 153(CA153) and cytokeratin fragment 19(CYFRA21-1) in the diagnosis of lung cancer patients. Methods: The clinical data of 120 patients with lung cancer diagnosed in Hengshui Second Hospital from January 2016 to June 2017 were analyzed retrospectively, and 50 healthy patients who underwent physical examination in the outpatient department during the same period were selected as the control group. The levels of CEA, CA19-9, CA125, CA153 and CYFRA21-1 in serum of each group were compared. Results: Serum CEA, CA19-9, CA125, CA153 and CYFRA21-1 levels in lung cancer group before operation were significantly higher than those in control group(P<0.05). The levels of serum CEA, CA19-9, CA125, CA153 and CYFRA21-1 in lung cancer group decreased gradually after 1 day, 7 days, 1 month and 3 months(P<0.05). The levels of CEA, CA125 and CA153 in patients with adenocarcinoma before operation were significantly higher than those in patients with squamous cell carcinoma(P<0.05), while the levels of CA19-9 and CYFRA21-1 in patients with squamous cell carcinoma before operation were significantly higher than those in patients with adenocarcinoma(P<0.05). Serum CEA, CA19-9, CA125, CA153 and CYFRA21-1 levels in patients with stage Ⅲ were significantly higher than those in stage Ⅰ + Ⅱ(P<0.05). Serum CEA, CA19-9, CA125, CA153 and CYFRA21-1 levels in patients with recurrence and metastasis before operation were significantly higher than those in patients without recurrence and metastasis(P<0.05). ROC curve showed that the area under the curve of CEA, CA19-9, CA125, CA153 and CYFRA21-1 in serum and the combined detection of 5 indexes were 0.729, 0.764, 0.744, 0.746, 0.838 and 0.937, these indexes’ sensitivities were 70.00, 59.20, 60.80, 51.70, 70.00 and 84.10, and their specificities were 58.00, 82.00, 80.00, 82.00, 88.00 and 96.00. Conclusion: Combined detection of serum CEA, CA19-9, CA125, CA153 and CYFRA21-1 can provide important value for early screening, diagnosis and follow-up of lung cancer, and can improve the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis.
作者 郭九玲 李冬霞 扈成伟 杨晓慧 GUO Jiuling;LI Dongxia;HU Chengwei;YANG Xiaohui(Clinical Laboratory,Hengshui Second Hospital,Hengshui Hebei 053000;Clinical Laboratory,Hengshui Fifth Hospital,Hengshui Hebei 053000;Department of Oncology,Hengshui Second Hospital,Hengshui Hebei 053000,China)
出处 《临床与病理杂志》 2020年第11期2858-2863,共6页 Journal of Clinical and Pathological Research
基金 衡水市科技计划项目(2017014017z)。
关键词 肺癌 癌胚抗原 糖类抗原19-9 糖类抗原125 糖类抗原153 细胞角质蛋白片段19 诊断 灵敏度 特异度 lung cancer carcinoembryonic antigen carbohydrate antigen 19-9 carbohydrate antigen 125 carbohydrate antigen 153 cytokeratin fragment 19 diagnosis sensitivity specificity
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献130

  • 1林沛茹,赵祝香,刘朝晖,赵子文.血清CEA联合CA125,CA199及CA153检测在肺癌诊断中的价值[J].广东医学,2006,27(11):1694-1695. 被引量:15
  • 2Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CACancer J Clin 2013; 63: 11-30 [PMID: 23335087 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21166].
  • 3Labianca R, Nordlinger B, Beretta GD, Brouquet A, CervantesA. Primary colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines fordiagnosis, adjuvant treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2010; 21Suppl 5: v70-v77 [PMID: 20555107 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdq168].
  • 4Berrino F, De Angelis R, Sant M, Rosso S, Bielska-Lasota M,Coebergh JW, Santaquilani M. Survival for eight major cancers andall cancers combined for European adults diagnosed in 1995-99:results of the EUROCARE-4 study. Lancet Oncol 2007; 8: 773-783[PMID: 17714991 DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70245-0].
  • 5National Cancer Institute SEER Stat Fact Sheets: Colon and rectum.2011. Available from: URL: http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/colorect.html.
  • 6Langan RC, Mullinax JE, Raiji MT, Upham T, Summers T,Stojadinovic A, Avital I. Colorectal cancer biomarkers and thepotential role of cancer stem cells. J Cancer 2013; 4: 241-250 [PMID:23459666 DOI: 10.7150/jca.5832].
  • 7Lech G, Slotwinski R, Krasnodebski IW. The role of tumor markersand biomarkers in colorectal cancer. Neoplasma 2014; 61: 1-8[PMID: 24195503 DOI: 10.4149/neo_2014_003].
  • 8Osborn NK, Ahlquist DA. Stool screening for colorectal cancer:molecular approaches. Gastroenterology 2005; 128: 192-206 [PMID:15633136 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.10.041].
  • 9Traverso G, Shuber A, Levin B, Johnson C, Olsson L, Schoetz DJ,Hamilton SR, Boynton K, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Detection ofAPC mutations in fecal DNA from patients with colorectal tumors.N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 311-320 [PMID: 11821507 DOI: 10.1056/Nejmoa012294].
  • 10Bosch LJ, Carvalho B, Fijneman RJ, Jimenez CR, Pinedo HM,van Engeland M, Meijer GA. Molecular tests for colorectal cancerscreening. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2011; 10: 8-23 [PMID: 21609931DOI: 10.3816/Ccc.2011.N.002].

共引文献1440

同被引文献280

引证文献25

二级引证文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部