期刊文献+

高职院校教师教学学术现状研究——以苏州地区三所高职院校为例

Research on the Academic Status of Teaching in Higher Vocational Colleges:A Case Study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于博耶、舒尔曼等人的教学学术思想,参考前人研究成果,文章构建了教学学术评价模式。通过对苏州地区三所高职院校教师教学学术发展现状的问卷调查研究,笔者收集实证数据,并通过SPSS软件对数据进行了定量分析,结果显示该三所高职院校教师的教学学术整体水平尚可,教师们普遍观念态度端正,学科专业知识扎实。基于研究结果分析,文章提出了优化教师队伍结构、加强教师队伍培训、完善教师评价制度和促进科研反哺教学四点启示,为高职院校教师发展中心职能定位和运行机制提供参考。 Based on Boyer and Schulman's teaching academic thoughts and referring to the previous research results,this paper constructs a teaching academic evaluation model.Based on the questionnaire survey of t*eachers academic development in three higher vocational colleges in Suzhou,the author collects empirical data and makes a quantitative analysis of the data through SPSS software.The results show that the overall teaching academic level of the teachers in the three higher vocational colleges is acceptable,the t*eachers general concepts and attitudes are correct,and their professional knowledge is solid.Based on the analysis of the research results,this paper puts forward four enlightenments:optimizing the structure of teachers,strengthening the training of teachers,improving the evaluation system of teachers,and promoting the scientific research,which provides reference for the functional orientation and operation mechanism of the teacher development center in higher vocational colleges.
作者 庄煜 李俊飞 ZHUANG Yu;LI Junfei(Suzhou Institute of Trade&Commerce,Suzhou 215009,Jiangsu Province)
出处 《江苏教育研究》 2020年第30期61-67,共7页 Jiangsu Education Research
基金 2016年度江苏省教育科学“十三五”规划课题职教重点资助课题“高职院校教师发展中心的职能定位研究——基于教学学术文化的视角”(项目编号:B-a/2016/03/09)研究成果。
关键词 高职院校 教师 教学学术 现状 higher vocational colleges teachers academic teaching current situation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献39

  • 1王富平.教育研究成果分类问题的探讨[J].上海教育科研,1996(10):1-4. 被引量:2
  • 2欧内斯特·博耶.美国大学教育-现状、经验、问题及对策.刘卫东等译[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,1980:169.
  • 3欧内斯特·博耶.关于美国教育改革的演讲[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2002.74.
  • 4Kreber C. Cranton p. a. exploring the scholar - ship of Teaching [ J ]. The Journal of Higher Education, 2000,71 (4) :476 -495.
  • 5Bass R. The Scholarship of Teaching : What' s the Problem? [ EB/OL]. http://www, doiit, gmu. edu! Archives/feb98/rbass. htm,2005 - 5 - 24.
  • 6Ernest I.. BoErnest L. Boyer. Scholarship Re considered.. Priorities of the Professorate. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1990.
  • 7Roger Boshier. Why is the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning such a hard sell'?. Higher Education ResearchDevelopment. 28(1 ). March2009.1 15.
  • 8Kreber, C. The scholarship of teaching and learning No one way. Interchange, Summer 2007. Retrieved from: http: //www. tla. ed. ac. uk/interchange/summer2007/kreberl. pdf.
  • 9Kreber, C. Conceptualizing the Scholarship of Teaching and Identifying Unresolved Isues: The Frame work for This Volume[J]. New Directions for Teaching and I.earning, Vol. 2001,(86): 1--18.
  • 10Braxton, J. , Luckey, W. , & Helland, P. (2002). In stitutionalizing a broader view of scholarship through Boyer' s four domains. (ASHE ERIC Higher Education Report, No. 29 6). San Francisco, CA: Jossey--Bass.

共引文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部