期刊文献+

MRI常规检查联合扩散加权成像对不典型肝脓肿与肝内胆管细胞癌鉴别诊断的价值 被引量:15

The value of routine MRI combined with diffusion-weighted imaging in the differential diagnosis of atypical liver abscess and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨MR常规检查联合扩散加权成像(diffusion-weighted imaging,DWI)鉴别诊断不典型肝脓肿与肝内胆管细胞癌(intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma,ICC)的价值。材料与方法回顾性分析19例ICC和19例不典型肝脓肿患者的MR图像,观察两组间病灶MR征象及病灶边缘实性部分的平均表观扩散系数(mean apparent diffusion coefficient,ADCmean)值及相对表观扩散系数(relative ADC,rADC)值的差异。采用独立样本t检验及χ2检验分析两组MR征象及ADC值的差异。结果 ICC与不典型肝脓肿在动脉期断环征、肝组织异常灌注、肝包膜的皱缩方面差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。ICC病灶边缘实性成分ADCmean值为(0.84±0.14)×10^-3mm^2/s,rADC值为(0.70±0.12);肝脓肿边缘实性部分的ADCmean值为(1.04±0.10)×10^-3mm^2/s,rADC值为(0.95±0.05),两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。ADCmean值、rADC值ROC曲线下面积分别为0.832、0.964,ADCmean值以0.86×10^-3mm^2/s为截断值,鉴别两者的敏感度、特异度分别为100%和63.2%,rADC以0.83为截断值,鉴别两者的敏感度、特异度分别为100%和84.2%。结论 MR常规检查联合DWI有助于鉴别ICC与不典型肝脓肿。 Objective:To investigate the value of MR routine examination combined with diffusion-weighted imaging(DWI)in the differentiation of atypical liver abscess and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma(ICC).Materials and Methods:MR images of 19 cases of ICC and 19 cases of atypical liver abscess were retrospectively identified,observing the difference in MR signs of the lesion,the mean apparent diffusion coefficient value(ADCmean)and the relative apparent diffusion coefficient value(rADC)of the solid part of the lesion edge between the two groups.Differences in MR signs and ADC values between the two groups were evaluated with the t test and χ^2 test.Results:ICC and atypical liver abscess showed statistically significant differences in arterial phase broken ring sign,hepatic perfusion disorders,and hepatic capsular retraction(P<0.05).The ADCmean value and rADC value of the solid components at the edge of the ICC lesion were(0.84±0.14)×10^-3 mm^2/s and(0.70±0.12),respectively;the ADCmean value and rADC value of the solid components at the edge of the liver abscess were(1.04±0.10)×10^-3 mm^2/s and(0.95±0.05),respectively;the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.001).The area under the ROC curve of ADCmean value and rADC value were 0.832 and 0.964,respectively.Taking 0.86×10^-3 mm^2/s as the cut-off value,the sensitivity and specificity of ADCmean value in distinguishing ICC from atypical liver abscess are 100%and 63.2%,respectively.Taking 0.83 as the cutoff value,the sensitivity and specificity of rADC to distinguish between the two are 100%and 84.2%,respectively.Conclusions:MR routine examination combined with DWI can help to distinguish ICC from atypical hepatic abscess.
作者 邓娟 王俊 李昇霖 刘显旺 薛彩强 周俊林 DENG Juan;WANG Jun;LI Shenglin;LIU Xianwang;XUE Caiqiang;ZHOU Junlin(Department of Radiology,Lanzhou University Second Hospital,Lanzhou 730030,China;Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730030,China;Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging,Gansu province,Lanzhou 730030,China)
出处 《磁共振成像》 CAS 2020年第12期1119-1123,共5页 Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
基金 兰州市人才创新创业项目(编号:2016-RC-58)
关键词 胆管细胞癌 肝脓肿 磁共振成像 扩散加权成像 表观扩散系数 cholangiocarcinoma liver abscess magnetic resonance imaging diffusionweighted imaging apparent diffusion coefficient
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献32

  • 1刘艳,陈文卫,李珏颖,张玉国,孙彬,胡伟,黄秀娟.SonoLiver时间强度曲线在肝脏局灶性占位病变超声造影中的应用价值[J].中华医学超声杂志(电子版),2011,8(5):1023-1032. 被引量:29
  • 2王凇,严昆,杨薇,陈敏华.肝脏炎性病灶超声造影定量分析[J].中华医学超声杂志(电子版),2013,10(5):368-373. 被引量:12
  • 3Vincenzo Cardinale,Rossella Semeraro,Alessia Torrice,Manuela Gatto,Cristina Napoli,Maria Consiglia Bragazzi,Raffaele Gentile,Domenico Alvaro.Intra-hepatic and extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma:New insight into epidemiology and risk factors[J].World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology,2010,2(11):407-416. 被引量:13
  • 4李绍林,张雪林,陈燕萍,陈斌,苍鹏.肝内周围型胆管细胞癌CT和MRI诊断及病理基础研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2004,38(10):1072-1074. 被引量:102
  • 5Hong CS, Chung KM, Huang PC, et al. Epidemiology and mortality of liver abscess in end-stage renal disease dialysis patients: Taiwan national cohort study [J]. PloS One, 2014, 9(2): e88078.
  • 6Foo NP, Chen KT, Lin H J, et al. Characteristics of pyogenic liver abscess patients with and without diabetes mellitus [J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2010, 105(2): 328-335.
  • 7de C Ferreira LE, Baron TH. Acute biliary conditions [J]. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 2013, 27(5): 745-756.
  • 8Lin AC, Yeh DY, Hsu YH, et al. Diagnosis of pyogenic liver abscess by abdominal ultrasonography in the emergency department [J]. Emerg Med J, 2009, 26(4): 273-275.
  • 9K.ishina M, Koda M, Tokunaga S, et al, Usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound with Sonazoid for evaluating liver abscess in comparison with conventional B-mode ultrasound [J]. Hepatol Res, 2014. [Epub ahead of print].
  • 10Feier D, Socaciu M, Anton O, et al. The combined role of intravenous contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and computed tomography (CT) in liver abscess diagnosis [J]. Chirurgia (Burcur), 2012, 107(3): 343-351.

共引文献83

同被引文献140

引证文献15

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部