期刊文献+

福建平潭市售水果中15种农药残留分析及评价

Determination and Risk Evaluation of 15 Pesticide Residues in Fruits in Pingtan City
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的初步了解福建平潭地区市售水果中杀菌剂和杀虫剂类农药残留情况及风险。方法随机抽样平潭各农贸市场及超市的水果,采用QuEChERS方法对60份新鲜水果进行农药多残留萃取,利用在线凝胶渗透色谱-气相色谱-质谱联用技术(GPC-GC-MS/MS)测定15种农药的残留情况,并以目标危险系数(THQ)量化风险水平。结果所有水果样本中共检出6种农药,农药含量均未超过国家食品限量值,其最大目标危险系数均远小于1,表明平潭地区消费者通过水果摄入的农药处于安全水平。结论初步风险评价结果显示平潭市售水果中的杀菌剂和杀虫剂类农药不会对消费者造成明显的健康风险。 OBJECTIVE This research is advantage to preliminarily understand the residues and risks of fungicides and insecticides in fruits sold in Pingtan City.METHODS A total of 60 samples of different fresh fruits were analyzed.Fruitsextract by QuEChERS were randomly sampled from farmer′s market and supermarkets in Pingtan City.The residues of 15 pesticides in fruits was determined using the online GPC-GC-MS/MS.The risk level was quantified by Target Hazard Quotient(THQ).RESULTS The results showed that a total of 6 pesticides were detected in all samples,none of which exceeded the maximum residue limits for pesticides in food.And the maximum target hazard quotient were far less than 1,which means that the pesticides consumed by consumers through fruits in Pingtan were at a safe level.CONCLUSION It was proved by preliminary risk assessment that fungicides and insecticides in fruits did not lead to significant health risks to consumers in Pingtan City.
作者 周浩德 陈华峰 张文婷 ZHOU Hao-de;CHEN Hua-feng;ZHANG Wen-ting(Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Zoonosis Research(Fujian Center for Disease Control&Prevention),Fuzhou 350001)
出处 《海峡药学》 2020年第11期78-80,共3页 Strait Pharmaceutical Journal
基金 福建省卫生健康科技计划项目资助(2019-2-15)。
关键词 水果 农药残留 风险评价 目标危险系数 Fruits Pesticide residues Risk assessment Target hazard quotient
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献53

  • 1赵保卿,李娜.基于层次分析法的内部审计外包内容决策研究[J].审计与经济研究,2013,28(1):37-45. 被引量:61
  • 2陈齐斌,季玉玲.化学农药的安全性评价及风险管理[J].云南农业大学学报,2005,20(1):99-106. 被引量:15
  • 3黄宝勇,欧阳喜辉,潘灿平.色谱法测定农产品中农药残留时的基质效应[J].农药学学报,2005,7(4):299-305. 被引量:96
  • 4ANASTASSIADES M, LEHOTAY S J, STAJNBAHER D. Quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe (QuEChERS) approach for the determination of pesticide residues[C]. 18th Annual Waste Testing and Quality Assurance Symposium Proceedings, 2002 : 231-241.
  • 5SCHENCK F J, HOBBS J E. Evaluation of the quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe (QuEChERS) approach to pesticide residue analysis[J]. Bull Environ Contain Toxicol, 2004, 73 (1) :24-30.
  • 6HERCEGOV A, KRUZ D, MATISOV E. Comparison of sample preparation methods combined with fast gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for ultratrace analysis of pesticide residues in baby food[J]. J Sep Sci, 2006, 29(8): 1 102-1 109.
  • 7LIU L B, HASHI Y, QIN Y P. Development of automated online gel permeation chromatographygas chromatograph mass spectrometry for measuring muhiresidual pesticides in agricultural products [J]. Journal of Chromatography B, 2007, 845 (1) : 61-68.
  • 8SCHENZLER C, THEIR H P. European standardization of methods for pesticide residue analysis in foods-current status[J]. Food Additives and Contaminants, 2001, 18(10) :875-879.
  • 9Director Notice of Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan. Analytical methods for residual compositional substances of agricultural chemicals, feed additives, and veterinary drugs in food[S]. Syoku-An No. 0124001, 2005, Final amendments were made on May 26, 2006.
  • 10MASTOVSKA K, LEHOTAY S J. Evaluation of common organic solvents for gas chromatographic analysis and stability of multiclass pesticide residues[J]. Journal of Chromatography A, 2004, 1 040(2): 259-272.

共引文献149

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部