CPR1000与AP1000机组主控室应急运行方式对比

Comparison of Operation Modes of CPR1000 and AP1000 Main Control Rooms under Accident Conditions

为研究CPR1000和AP1000机组主控室应急运行方式上的特点,通过对比CPR1000和AP1000机组应急规程的设计原理、规程文件体系及蒸汽发生器传热管破裂事故工况下CPR1000和AP1000机组主控室应急运行方式,总结了两类机组应急运行方式下主控室岗位设置、岗位职责、指挥体系、规程执行等方面的特点及差异。两类机组主控室应急运行方式存在不同,根本原因在于技术路线的差异,事故工况主控室能否高效运作关键取决于运行人员能否够高效执行事故程序及相关管理规定。

In order to study the characteristics of emergency operation modes of CPR1000 and AP1000 main control rooms,the characteristics and differences in post setting,post responsibilities,command system,and procedure execution of the main control rooms under CPR1000 and AP1000 emergency operation modes are summarized by comparing the principles and procedure documents of CPR1000 and AP1000 emergency procedures and the emergency operation modes of CPR1000 and AP1000 main control rooms under SGTR accident conditions.The emergency operation modes of the main control rooms of the two types of units are different.The fundamental reason lies in the difference of technical routes.The efficient operation of the main control rooms under accident conditions depends on whether the operators can effectively implement the accident procedures and relevant management regulations.