摘要
利用Altmetrics文献社会影响力评价体系和方法,以2014至2018年管理学国际权威论文为例,对其进行首次社会影响力评价实证研究。结论显示:管理学权威学术论文可以进行Altmetrics社会影响力评价;管理学权威论文社会影响力评价指标间存在一定关系,如Score与Tweeters、News Outlets指标成高度显著正相关,Facebook与Mendeley指标成中度正相关;管理学权威论文学术影响力与社会影响力评价指标间存在一定关系。该研究为科学开展管理学文献社会影响力评价,进而建立全面的文献评价体系提供支撑。
Using the Altmetrics literature social impact evaluation system and method,taking the international authoritative papers of management from 2014 to 2018 as an example,the first empirical study of social impact evaluation was conducted.The results show that the authoritative academic papers in management can be evaluated for Altmetrics’social influence.There is a certain relationship between the social impact evaluation indicators of authoritative management papers.For example,score has a highly significant positive correlation with Tweeters and News Outlets,and Facebook has a moderate positive correlation with Mendeley.There is a certain relationship between the academic and social influence evaluation indicators of management authority literature.This research provides important support for the evaluation of the social impact of management literature and the establishment of a comprehensive literature evaluation system.
作者
房宏君
穆红莉
刘莹
Fang Hongjun;Mu Hongli;Liu Ying
出处
《新世纪图书馆》
CSSCI
2020年第11期87-93,共7页
New Century Library
基金
国家社科基金项目“新生代农民工本地创业行为的东西部比较研究”(项目编号:15BJY029)
北京市社会科学基金重点项目“北京市教育科研热点、前沿及其演进的图谱可视分析”(项目编号:15JYA005)研究成果之一。