摘要
在公布行政违法信息的法律属性诸说中,是否将其确认为声誉罚实施形式最具争议性。现实中存在将行政违法信息公布全然视为常态性政府信息公开行为及非常态性公共警告行为的两种倾向。然有部分公布行政违法信息行为不仅吻合声誉罚之实质判断标准,且呈现出与常态性政府信息公开及非常态性公共警告间截然不同的制度逻辑,印证了公布行政违法信息作为一项处罚措施存在的独立价值。公布行政违法信息作为声誉罚须遵循一定的适用规则以确保处罚效果,为赋予此种处罚形式更大作用空间,可考虑修订《行政处罚法》,适当放宽对处罚设定权的限制。
In the legal attributes of publishing administrative illegal information,whether to recognize it as the forms of reputation penalty is the most controversial.In reality,there are two tendencies to regard the publication of administrative illegal information as the normal government information disclosure behavior and the public warning behavior of the very state.However,some acts of publishing administrative illegal information not only meet the substantive judgment criteria of reputation penalty,but also show the system logic which is quite different from the normal government information disclosure and the extraordinary public warning?which confirms the independent value of publishing administrative illegal information as a punishment measure.The publication of administrative illegal information as a reputation penalty must follow certain applicable rules to ensure the generation of the effect of punishment,in order to give this form of punishment more room,may consider amending the Administrative Penalty Law,appropriately relax the restrictions on the right to set penalties.
作者
贺译葶
HE Yi-ting(College of Credit Risk Management,Xiangtan University,Xiangtan 411105)
出处
《行政法学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第6期78-89,共12页
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
基金
湖南省哲学社会科学基金重点项目“司法执行中信用惩戒适用研究”(项目编号:18ZDB010)。
关键词
公布行政违法信息
行政违法信息公布
声誉罚
行政处罚
Publishing Administrative Illegal Informations
Publication of Information on Administrative violations
Reputational Penalties
Administrative Penalties