期刊文献+

心理干预联合雷贝拉唑治疗消化性溃疡的效果及对患者睡眠质量的影响 被引量:3

Effect of Psychological Intervention Combined with Rabeprazole in the Treatment of Peptic Ulcer and and Its Influence on the Sleep Quality of Patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨心理干预联合雷贝拉唑治疗消化性溃疡的效果及对患者睡眠质量的影响。方法:选取2017年6月-2019年6月本院收治的80例消化性溃疡患者。按照患者入院的先后顺序将其分为观察组和对照组,各40例。对照组进行常规药物治疗,观察组进行心理干预联合雷贝拉唑治疗。比较两组治疗效果、不良反应发生情况、治疗前后睡眠质量及治疗后生活质量。结果:观察组治疗总有效率为95.00%,高于对照组的80.00%(P<0.05)。观察组不良反应发生率为5.00%,低于对照组的20.00%(P<0.05)。治疗后,两组匹茨堡睡眠质量指数量表(PSQI)评分均低于治疗前,且观察组低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组治疗后各项生活质量评分均高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:心理干预联合雷贝拉唑治疗消化性溃疡患者的效果较好,可改善患者的睡眠质量及生活质量,安全性较好,值得临床应用。 Objective:To explore the effect of psychological intervention combined with Rabeprazole in the treatment of peptic ulcer and its influence on the sleep quality of patients.Method:A total of 80 patients with peptic ulcer in our hospital from June 2017 to June 2019 were selected.According to the order of admission,they were divided into observation group and control group,40 cases in each group.The control group was treated with conventional drug treatment,and the observation group was treated with psychological intervention combined with Rabeprazole.The treatment effect,adverse reactions,sleep quality before and after treatment and quality of life after treatment were compared between the two groups.Result:The total effective rate of the observation group was 95.00%,higher than 80.00% of the control group (P<0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 5.00%,lower than 20.00% in the control group (P<0.05).After treatment,Pittsburgh sleep quality index scale (PSQI) scores of both groups were lower than those before treatment,and that of the observation group was lower than the control group (P<0.05).All the quality of life scores after treatment in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion:Psychological intervention combined with Rabeprazole in the treatment of patients with peptic ulcer has a good effect,which can improve the quality of sleep and life of patients.It is safe and worthy of clinical application.
作者 梁君铭 骆雪梅 廖惠充 卢丹 LIANG Junming;LUO Xuemei;LIAO Huichong;LU Dan(Xingtan Hospital Affiliated to Shunde Hospital of Southern Medical University,Foshan 528325,China;不详)
出处 《中国医学创新》 CAS 2020年第32期155-158,共4页 Medical Innovation of China
关键词 雷贝拉唑 心理干预 消化性溃疡 睡眠质量 Rabeprazole Psychological intervention Peptic ulcer Sleep quality
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献131

  • 1陈远忠,郭健,陈大勇.阿齐霉素三联与克拉霉素三联疗法根除HP的疗效比较[J].重庆医学,2005,34(9):1403-1404. 被引量:2
  • 2蒲亨萍,唐禄静.消化性溃疡复发原因及护理对策[J].护士进修杂志,2007,22(15):1420-1421. 被引量:37
  • 3Fond G, koundou A, Hamdani N, et al. Anxiety and depression co- morbidities in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) :a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur Arch Psychiatry Chn Neurosci ,2014,264 (8) :651 -660.
  • 4Sipe WE, Eisendrath SJ. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy : theory and practice[J]. Can J Psychiatry,2012,57(2) :63 -69.
  • 5Morgan D. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression : a new approach to preventing relapse [ J ]. Psychother Res, 2003,13 ( 1 ) : 123 - 125.
  • 6Kim YW, Lee SH, Choi TK, et al. Effectiveness of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy as an adjuvant to pharmacotherapy in patients with panic disorder or generalized anxiety disorder[ J ]. Depress Anxiety, 2009,26(7 ) :601 - 606.
  • 7Hofmann SG, Sawyer AT, Witt AA, et al. The effect of mindfulness- based therapy on anxiety and depression: A meta-analytic review [ J]. J Consult Clin Psyeho1,2010,78 (2) : 169 - 183.
  • 8Zemicke KA, Campbell TS, Blustein PK, etal. Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome Symptoms : A Randomized Wait-list Controlled Trial [J]. Int J Behav Med,2013,20(3) :385 -396.
  • 9郑晓琳,赵小红.健康教育对消化性溃疡患者遵医行为的影响[J].当代护士(中旬刊),2008,15(3):86-88. 被引量:15
  • 10陈春芳.消化性溃疡患者的心理社会因素调查及心理干预[J].护理实践与研究,2008,5(13):1-2. 被引量:23

共引文献140

同被引文献35

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部