《翠峰亭记》与《翠峰亭铭》——《全唐文》误收《房史君翠峰亭题记》及相关问题考

The Records of Cui Feng Pavilion and The Inscription of Cui Feng Pavilion:Fang Chancellor’s Cui Feng Pavilion Inscription Inscribed in Tang Classic by Mistake and Related Issues

《翠峰亭记》为唐天宝八载(749)、《翠峰亭铭》为北宋嘉祐七年(1062)的石刻,是目前学界共识。本文利用明代地方文献,结合清初流传拓本相关记载和新出土的石刻材料进行考证,发现现存《翠峰亭记》和《翠峰亭铭》并非唐宋原石,而是清嘉庆、道光年间重刻之石。《全唐文》所收《房史君翠峰亭题记》,实系宋人王震所撰《翠峰亭铭》。《翠峰亭记》中的“房太守”是房涣还是房武,以现有文献还难下定论。若“房太守”确为房涣,也非开元中资州刺史房涣,当另有其人。

The Records of Cui Feng Pavilion appeared in the eighth year of the Tang Dynasty(749),and The Inscription of Cui Feng Pavilion appeared in the seventh year of the Northern Song Dynasty(1062),which is the current consensus of the academic community.With the help of the local literature of the Ming Dynasty,the early Qing dynasty circulating topology records and new stone carving materials,this paper finds that the existing Cui Feng Pavilion Records and Cui Feng Pavilion Inscription is not the original Tang and Song stone,but the recarved stone in Jiaqing period and Daoguang period in the Qing Dynasty.Tang Classic received Fang Chancellor’s Cui Feng Pavilion Inscription,is actually the song people Wang Zhen wrote The Inscription of Cui Feng Pavilion.The Records of Cui Feng Pavilion in the name of“Fang Taishou”was Fang Huan or Fang Wu,the known literature is still difficult to make a conclusion.If the“Fang Chancellor”is indeed Fang Huan,who is also another person with the same name.