组织的错位与“两个口号”论争

Dislocation of Organization and Debate of “Two Slogans”

“两个口号”论争是在“左联”解散并准备建立文艺界抗日民族统一战线时发生在左翼文坛内部的论争。“国防文学”派服从以周扬为书记的“文委”这一级党组织的领导,“民族革命战争的大众文学”的拥护者则服从中共中央代表冯雪峰的意见。论争双方共同践行了列宁提出的“写作事业”是“有组织的、有计划的、统一的党的工作的一个组成部分”这一指导理论,表现出强烈的组织观念和党性原则。但两个组织之间缺乏有效沟通,都认为己方代表了党,对方损害了党的威信。组织没有统一,有了错位,论争也就相持不下。同时,周扬、冯雪峰等人当时还都缺乏“统战”不同意见的能力,论争造成了长期的负面影响。

The debate of “Two Slogans” occurred in the left-wing literary circle when the Left Coalition of Writers dissolved and prepared to establish the Anti-Japanese National United Front in the literary and art circles. The “national defense literature” faction obeyed the leadership of the Party organization at the level of the “Culture Commission” with Zhou Yang as its secretary, while the supporters of the mass literature of the National Revolutionary War obeyed the opinions of Feng Xuefeng, a representative of the CPC Central Committee. Both sides of the dispute have shown strong organizational concept and principle of Party spirit. Due to the lack of effective communication between the two organizations, both believed that their own side represented the Party and the other side damageed the Party’s prestige. Because of the disunity and dislocation of organization, this debate was locked in a stalement.