期刊文献+

中美规范下缓和曲线最小长度对比分析 被引量:3

Comparative Analysis on the Minimum Length of Transition Curve Based on Chinese Standards and USA Codes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过分析高速公路缓和曲线最小长度取值的影响因素,对比中、美两国规范在高速公路平面设计时缓和曲线最小长度指标选取的差异,并介绍存在差异的原因。经分析认为,中、美规范中超高缓和段的设置有较大区别,相同条件下美国规范缓和曲线最小长度取值比我国略小。 By analyzing the influencing factors on the minimum length of expressway transition curve,the differences between the selection of the minimum length index of expressway transition curve in geometric design are compared based on Chinese standards and USA codes,and the reasons for the differences are introduced.The analysis reveals that the setting of superelevation transition in USA codes differs from Chinese standards and the minimum length of the transition curve in USA codes is slightly smaller than that of Chinese standards.
作者 曾志刚 杜朝阳 ZENG Zhigang;DU Chaoyang(CCCC Second Highway Consultants Co.,Ltd.,Wuhan 430063,China)
出处 《交通科技》 2020年第6期89-92,共4页 Transportation Science & Technology
关键词 中国规范 美国规范 缓和曲线最小长度 对比分析 Chinese standards American codes minimum length of transition curve comparative analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献4

共引文献2

同被引文献9

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部