期刊文献+

作为“典范”的“规矩”——理解《孟子》的一个关键隐喻 被引量:1

A Reexamination of Guiju as Model:A Key Metaphor in Mengzi
原文传递
导出
摘要 “规矩”一词是我们进入《孟子》、理解孟子哲学的一个关键隐喻。通过波兰尼对“规则”与“典范”的分疏,可知在孟子以“规矩”类比“圣人”的相关论说中,“规矩”并非意指客观抽象的法条规则,而是作为“典范”而出场。就其客观品格而言,“规矩”在《孟子》的思想脉络中表现出教高于政、以卓越为指归、模糊性等三个特征。从而“规矩”不再是必须遵守的法则法条,而在于提供一个道德技艺实践的具体典范。而就其实践行动的旨趣而言,作为“典范”的“规矩”则在“圣人之风”与“意志之兴”中指引了德性生命生长的方向。 The term guiju is a key metaphor in the philosophy of Mengzi that calls for further investigation.Relying on Michael Polanyi's distinction between“rule”and“example,”we can know that in Mengzi's bringing together“the Sage”and“guiju”,the term does not refer to abstract rules of law,but should be understood as a philosophically ideal model with exemplary personality features and social manners.In terms of its objective characteristics as used in the Mengzi,the term guiju consistently demonstrates the notion that“teaching is superior to politics”,that excellence serves as a concrete reference for it,and also that ambiguity too has its own high value.Thus,in addition to rules of law which must be followed,the Mengzi uses the term guiju to refer to a specific model for practicing moral skills.This paper examines the practical purposes of the application of guiju as a model that guides the direction of one's moral life development with attention to phrases such as“the wind of the Sage”and“the prosperity of will”.
作者 徐翔 Xu Xiang
出处 《哲学动态》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第11期32-40,127,128,共11页 Philosophical Trends
关键词 规矩 典范 圣人
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献27

  • 1Alessandro Ferrara, Reflective Authenticity, Rethinking the Project of Modernity (London and New York, Routledge, 1998,第2章.
  • 2Alessandro Ferrara, Reflective Authenticity, Rethinking the Project of Modernity (London and New York, Routledge, 1998,第3章.
  • 3Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (London and New York, Routledge,2001), 5.6.2.
  • 4Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations (Oxford, Blackwell, 2003), § 217.
  • 5《事实与价值二分的崩溃及其他论文》[ The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and other Essays ( Cambridge Ma. , Harvard University Press, 2002) ].
  • 6Willard van Orman Quine, From a Logical Poira of View ( New York, Harper, 1963 ), p. 24.
  • 7Max Weber, "Objectivity in Social Science and Social Policy" (1904) , in Edward A. Shils and Henry A. Finch ( eds. ), The Methodology of the Social Sciences, Max Weber ( New York, Free Press, 1949), pp. 72 -76.
  • 8Michael Walzer, "Two Kinds of Universalism", in Nation and Universe, The Tanner Lectures on Human Values (Salt Lake City, University of Utah Press, 1990).
  • 9Tzvetan Todorov, Nous et les autres: la reflexion francaise sur la diversite humaine (Paris, Seuil, 1989).
  • 10Jurgen Habermas, Postmetaphysical Thinking, Philosophical Essays ( Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1992).

共引文献7

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部