期刊文献+

剖宫产再次足月妊娠分娩产妇的护理效果观察

Nursing Effect Observation of Full-term Pregnancy Delivery Puerperae After Caesarean Section
下载PDF
导出
摘要 探讨对剖宫产后再次足月妊娠顺娩产妇的护理效果。选取2016年1月—2018年12月蚌埠市第三人民医院妇产科180例剖宫产术后再次足月妊娠分娩的产妇,将其分为顺娩组和手术分娩组,顺娩组77例,手术分娩组103例,对比两组产妇的各项临床护理指标。顺娩组的产后出血量显著少于手术分娩组。排气时间、下床时间显著早于手术分娩组。宫缩乏力、产褥感染、后期产后出血量均显著少于手术分娩组。产后住院时长显著短于手术分娩组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对剖宫产再次足月妊娠顺娩产妇进行护理干预,可降低产妇发生并发症的机率,并有效提高产妇的护理满意度与生活质量。 We explore the nursing effect of full-term pregnancy delivery puerperae after caesarean section.180 full-term pregnancy delivery puerperae after caesarean section from Jan.2016 to Dec.2018 in Bengbu City Third People’s Hospital are divided into normal labor group and operation labor group,with 77 cases in normal labor group and 103 cases in operation labor group.All clinical nursing indexes of two groups are compared.Postpartum amount of bleeding of normal labor group is significantly less than operation labor group.Postpartum hospitalization time is significantly shorter than operation labor group,with statistically significant difference(P<0.05).Nursing intervention of full-term pregnancy delivery puerperae after caesarean section can reduce the complication rate of puerperae,and effectively improve puerperae’s nursing satisfaction and living quality.
作者 闫华 闫坤 邹青 Yan Hua;Yan Kun;Zou Qing(Gynecology and Obstetrics, Bengbu City Third People’s Hospital, Bengbu 233000, China)
出处 《黑龙江科学》 2020年第24期90-91,共2页 Heilongjiang Science
基金 蚌埠医学院自然科学类项目(BYKY2019290ZD)。
关键词 剖宫产 再次足月妊娠 分娩产妇 护理效果 Caesarean section Full-term pregnancy Delivery puerperae Nursing effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献51

  • 1张小勤.剖宫产术后再次妊娠177例分娩方式分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2006,22(1):57-58. 被引量:262
  • 2Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gtilmezoglu AM,et al. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007 - 2008 [ J ]. Lancet, 2010, 375 (9713 ) :490-499.
  • 3Harper LM, Macones GA. Predicting success and reducing the risks when attempting vaginal birth after cesarean [ J ]. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 2008, 63 (8) :538-545.
  • 4Merrill BS, Gibbs CE. Planned vaginal delivery following cesare- an section[ J]. Obstet Gynecol,1978, 52( 1 ) :50-52.
  • 5Macones GA, Peipert J, Nelson DB, et al. Maternal complica- tions, with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenter study [ J ]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 193 (5) : 1656-1662.
  • 6Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY, et al. The MFMU Cesar- ean Registry:factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery [ J ]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 193 (3 Pt 2) :1016-1023.
  • 7Koroukian SM. Relative risk of postpartum complications in the Ohio Medicaid population: vaginal versus cesarean delivery[ J ]. Med Care Res Rev, 2004, 61(2) :203-224.
  • 8Lydon-Rochelle MT, Cahill AG, Spong CY. Birth after previous cesarean delivery : short-term maternal outcomes [ J ].Semin Perinatol, 2010, 34(4) :249-257.
  • 9Silver RM. Delivery after previous cesarean: long-term maternal outcomes [ J ]. Semin Perinatol, 2010, 34 (4) :258-266.
  • 10Guise JM, Denman MA, Emeis C, et al. Vaginal birth after ce- sarean: new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes [ J ]. Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 115 (6) : 1267-1278.

共引文献315

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部