期刊文献+

考虑碳价下限的燃煤发电碳减排投资及其政策分析 被引量:11

Carbon Emission Reduction Investment for Coal-fired Power Plants and Policy Analysis Considering Carbon Price Floor
原文传递
导出
摘要 燃煤发电是电力供应保障的重要基础,也是二氧化碳排放的主要来源之一。论文针对碳排放权价格(碳价)、燃煤发电商上网电量以及碳减排设施的单位运维成本都随机波动的情况,构建考虑碳价下限的燃煤发电商碳减排投资实物期权模型,在模型求解基础上,针对某60万千瓦燃煤发电机组,通过数值仿真方法,考察碳价下限对碳减排预期投资时间的影响,并探讨碳价初值、碳减排单位运维成本初值如何影响碳价下限政策的有效性,比较碳价下限与直接投资补贴政策的优劣,分析结果表明:(1)碳价下限政策可能会激励燃煤发电商提早进行碳减排投资,但提高碳价下限不一定能降低碳减排投资阈值;(2)碳价下限政策实施的有效区域由碳价初值、碳减排单位运维成本初值等参数有关,在该有效区域内,通过碳价下限的调整可调节碳减排投资的预期时间;(3)相对于直接投资补贴政策,碳价下限能显著节省补贴资金。 Reducing carbon dioxide emissions is a national macro goal.To achieve this goal,carbon emission reduction of coal-fired power generation is considered to be crucial.Although the proportion of renewable energy generation is increasing,coal-fired power generation is still the main source and an important guarantee of electricity supply.Therefore,encouraging coal-fired power plants to invest in carbon emission reduction and reducing carbon emissions per unit power generation may be one of the feasible ways to achieve carbon emission reduction target and guarantee sufficient electricity supply.Three Geometric Brownian motions are employed to characterize respectively the random fluctuation of carbon emission right price(carbon price),on grid power of coal-fired power plants and unit operation and maintenance cost of carbon emission reduction facilities,and a real option model of carbon emission reduction investment for coal-fired power plants considering carbon price floor is proposed in this paper.Based on the solution of the model,for a 600,000 kW coal-fired power unit,the effect of carbon price floor on the expected investment timing of carbon emission reduction is investigated applied with the numerical simulation whose parameter values come from references or technical data of the generator.Then the effect of the initial carbon price and the initial per unit operation and maintenance costs on incentive carbon price floor are discussed,whose result reveal the valid region of carbon price floor support scheme,and the advantages and disadvantages of carbon price floor support scheme with direct investment subsidies policy is compared.The analysis results indicate that,(1)whether carbon price floor can motivate coal-fired power plants to make carbon emission reduction investment is related to the initial carbon price and the initial per unit carbon emission reduction costs.When the initial prices are within the valid region,the expected investment timing can be induced by adjusting carbon price floor.When the initial prices are above the supremum of the valid region,coal-fired power plants will make a carbon emission reduction investment even if there is no carbon price floor support scheme.However,they will not invest within a predetermined timing when the initial prices are below the infimum of the valid region.(2)Compared with direct investment subsidies policy,carbon price floor support scheme can significantly save subsidies funds.Moreover,the combination of direct investment subsidies and tax exemptions can not only save subsidies funds,but also provide more incentives for coal-fired power plants to invest in carbon emission reduction.
作者 张新华 黄天铭 甘冬梅 叶泽 ZHANG Xin-hua;HUANG Tian-ming;GAN Dong-mei;YE Ze(School of Economic and Management,Changsha University of Science and Technology,Changsha 410114,China)
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2020年第11期167-174,共8页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71671018,71271033) 湖南省自然科学基金资助项目(2018JJ2447) 湖南省高校创新平台开放基金资助项目(18K045)。
关键词 实物期权 碳价下限 碳减排 燃煤发电 real option carbon price floor carbon emission reduction coal-fired power generation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献102

  • 1陈文颖,高鹏飞,何建坤.二氧化碳减排对中国未来GDP增长的影响[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2004,44(6):744-747. 被引量:87
  • 2陈黎明,邱菀华.不确定环境下新技术投资策略模型研究[J].管理科学学报,2005,8(4):9-14. 被引量:16
  • 3王广民,万仲平,王先甲.二(双)层规划综述[J].数学进展,2007,36(5):513-529. 被引量:69
  • 4BARANZINI A, GOLDEMBERG J, SPECK S. A fu- ture for carbon taxes. Ecological Economics, 2000, 32(3) :395-412.
  • 5GUO Z, ZHANG X, ZHENG Y, et al. Exploring the impacts of a carbon tax on the Chinese economy u- sing a CGE model with a detailed disaggregation of energy sectors. Energy Economies, 2014,45 : 455 - 462.
  • 6LEE T C, CHANG Y T, LEE P T W. Economy-wide impact analysis of a carbon tax on international con- tainer shipping. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2013,58:87-102.
  • 7PERDAN S, AZAPAGIC A. Carbon trading:current schemes and future developments. Energy Policy, 2011,39(10) :6040-6054.
  • 8STRAND J. Strategic climate policy with offsets and incomplete abatement:carbon taxes versus cap-and- trade. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management ,2013,66(2) :202-218.
  • 9HE Y,WANG L,WANG J. Cap-and-trade vs. car- bon taxes : a quantitative comparison from a genera- tion expansion planning perspective. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2012,63 (3) :708-716.
  • 10BRISTOW A L, WARDMAN M, ZANNI A M, et al. Public acceptability of personal carbon trading and carbon tax. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69 ( 9 ) : 1824-1837.

共引文献111

同被引文献137

引证文献11

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部