期刊文献+

奥沙利铂联合替吉奥治疗转移性或不可切除局部晚期三阴乳腺癌的疗效观察 被引量:7

Efficacy of oxaliplatin combined with tegafur for metastatic/unresectable advanced local triple negative breast cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨奥沙利铂联合替吉奥化疗方案治疗转移性/不可切除的局部晚期三阴乳腺癌的临床疗效及对预后的影响。方法选取2018年1月至2019年1月间空军军医大学第一附属医院收治的100例转移性/不可切除的局部晚期三阴乳腺癌患者,采用随机数表法分为观察组和对照组,每组50例。对照组患者采用吉西他滨联合顺铂治疗,观察组患者采用奥沙利铂联合替吉奥治疗,6个周期化疗后,比较两组患者治疗前后血清糖类抗原153(CA153)和癌胚抗原(CEA)变化,统计两组患者生存率及不良反应。结果治疗后,观察组患者治疗总有效率为76.0%,对照组为60.0%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗前,两组患者血清CA153和CEA水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后,两组患者血清CA153和CEA水平均下降,且观察组均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。随访6个月,观察组患者生存率为86.0%,对照组为80.0%,两组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组患者不良反应发生率为24.0%,对照组为38.0%,两组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论奥沙利铂联合替吉奥化疗方案治疗转移性/不可切除的局部晚期三阴乳腺癌疗效确切,可有效降低患者血清CA153和CEA水平,提高生存率,改善预后安全性高。 Objective To explore the efficacy of chemotherapy with oxaliplatin combined with tegafur for metastatic/unresectable advanced local triple negative breast cancer.Methods One hundred patients with metastatic/non-resectable advanced local triple negative breast cancer were selected as the study subjects at The First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Military Medical University from January 2018 to January 2019.They were divided into an observation group and a control group using the random number table method with 50 patients each.The observation group received oxaliplatin combined with tegafur and the control group received gemcitabine combined with cisplatin.Changes in serum carbohydrate antigen 153(CA153)and carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA)were compared between the two groups after 6 cycles of treatment.Survival rates and adverse reactions were calculated.Results After the treatment,the overall efficacy rate was 76.0%in the observation group which was higher than 60.0%of the control group with no significant difference(P>0.05).Before the treatment,there was no significant difference in serum CA153 and CEA levels between the two groups(P>0.05).Compared with before the treatment,serum CA153 and CEA were significantly decreased in the two groups after the treatment and the above indicators were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group(all P<0.05).After 6-month follow-up,the rate of survival was 86.0%in the observation group and 80.0%in the control group(P>0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions was 24.0%in the observation group and 38.0%in the control group(P>0.05).Conclusion Chemotherapy with oxaliplatin combined with tegafur is effective in the treatment of metastatic/unresectable advanced local triple negative breast cancer,and it can effectively reduce the level of serum CA153 and CEA and improve the survival rate and the prognosis.
作者 李新涛 申兴勇 胡珍 李朱斌 LI Xin-tao;SHEN Xing-yong;HU Zhen;LI Zhu-bin(The Second Department of Internal Medicine,Shaanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital,Xi'an 710061,China;Department of Oncology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Military Medical University,Xi'an 710032;Department of Gynecology,Xi'an Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Xi'an 710002,China;Department of Minimally Invasive Intervention,Shaanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital,Xi'an 710061,China)
出处 《中国肿瘤临床与康复》 2020年第11期1294-1297,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology and Rehabilitation
关键词 三阴性乳腺肿瘤 奥沙利铂 替吉奥 生存率 不良反应 Triple-negative breast neoplasms Oxaliplatin Tegafur Survival rate Adverse reactions
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献123

  • 1陈智伟,廖美琳,陈玉蓉,赵家美,张心敏,成柏君.WHO标准和RECIST标准评价肺癌化疗疗效的比较[J].循证医学,2004,4(2):83-84. 被引量:34
  • 2杨学宁,吴一龙.实体瘤治疗疗效评价标准——RECIST[J].循证医学,2004,4(2):85-90. 被引量:1520
  • 3World Health Organization. World Health Organization Handbook for Reporting Results of Cancer Treatment[S]. (World Health Organization offset publication no. 48. ) Geneva: World Health Organization, 1979.
  • 4Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors [ J ]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2000, 92 ( 3 ) :205-216.
  • 5Therasse P, Le Cesne A, Van Glabbeke M, et al. RECIST vs WHO: Prospective comparison of response criteria in an EORTC phase Ⅱ clinical trial investigating ET-743 in advanced soft tissue sarcoma[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2005,41 : 1426-1430.
  • 6Prasad SR, Saini S, Sumner JE, et al. Radiological measurement of breast cancer metastases to lung and liver: comparison between WHO (bidimensional) and RECIST (unidimensional) guidelines [J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2003,27(3) :380- 384.
  • 7Spears CP. Volume doubling measurement of spherical and ellipsoidal tumors[ J ]. Med Pediatr Oncol, 1984,12:212-217.
  • 8Kanazawa K, Yokouchi H, Wang X, et al. Phase II trial of carbopla- tin and pemetrexed as first - line chemotherapy for non - squamous non -small cell lung cancer, and correlation between the efficacy/ toxicity and genetic polymorphisms associated with pemetrexed metab- olism:Hokkaido Lung Cancer Clinical Study Group Trim (HOT) 0902 [ J ]. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 2014,74 : 1149 - 1157.
  • 9Therasse P, Arbuek SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to e- valuate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European organiza- tion for research and treatment of cancer, national cancer institute of the united states, national cancer institute of Canada [ J ]. J Natl Cancer lnst, 2000,92:205 -216.
  • 10Stemmler HJ, diGioia D, Freier W, et al. Randomised phase U trial of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine vs gemcitabine plus cisplatin vs gem- citabine plus capecitabine in patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer [ J ]. Br J Cancer,2011,104 : 1071 - 1078.

共引文献233

同被引文献80

引证文献7

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部