期刊文献+

疾病诊断相关组在绩效评价中的应用——以县级公立医院为例 被引量:1

Application of Disease Diagnosis Related Group in Performance Evaluation—Take County Public Hospitals as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过分析山东省临沂市某县级公立医院2017-2019年全院DRG相关指标,评价各院医疗服务绩效,为DRG(疾病诊断相关组)在县级公立医院精细化管理中的应用提供参考。方法研究主要通过对医疗服务能力、医疗服务效率、医疗服务质量指标进行年度纵向比较,对各科室DRG三大维度、七大指标及综合分值进行排名分析,进行医院住院医疗服务绩效评价。结果三年内医院医疗服务能力、医疗服务效率、医疗服务质量均有提高,内分泌科科室综合排名第一。结论DRG医疗服务绩效评价依赖病案首页信息的准确性和完整性,应引进第三方咨询团队以促进DRG在县级公立医院的应用。 Objective To evaluate the medical service performance of a county-level public hospital from 2017 to 2019 by analyzing the drG-related indexes of the hospital,so as to provide reference for the application of DRG(disease diagnosis related group)in the fine management of county-level public hospitals.Methods This study conducted an annual longitudinal comparison of the indicators of medical service capacity,medical service efficiency and medical service quality,and conducted a ranking analysis of the DRG dimensions,seven indicators and comprehensive scores of each department,so as to evaluate the performance of hospital inpatient medical service.Results The medical service capacity,efficiency and quality of medical service were improved,and the department of endocrinology ranked first.Conclusions The performance evaluation of DRG medical service relies on the accuracy and completeness of the information on the first page of medical records,and a third-party consulting team should be introduced to promote the application of DRG in county-level public hospitals.
作者 赵莉 宫雷红 袁隽明 刘彦宁 ZHAO Li;GONG Leihong;YUAN Juanming(Dalian Medical University)
出处 《航空航天医学杂志》 2020年第11期1296-1298,共3页 Journal of Aerospace medicine
关键词 DRG 县级公立医院 绩效评价 DRG County-level public hospitals The performance evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献35

  • 1黄慧英.诊断相关分类法在北京地区医院管理中的可行性研究[J].中华医院管理杂志,1994,10(3):131-136. 被引量:100
  • 2胡向阳,王原,张修梅.病例组合概念及其应用[J].中华医院管理杂志,1994,10(12):736-739. 被引量:36
  • 3张秀红.综合指数法在医疗工作评价中的应用[J].中国卫生统计,2006,23(5):477-477. 被引量:13
  • 4Fetter R, Freeman J, Averill A, et al. Case mix definition by di- agnosis related groups[J]. MedCare, 1980, 18(2): 1-53.
  • 5Francis HRF. Case mix use in 25 countries: a migration success but international comparisons failure[J]. International Journal of Medical Informaties, 200a, 7O." 215-219.
  • 6北京市政府.北京市2010-2011年深化医药卫生体制改革实施方案[EB/OL].[2010-06-04].[2011-09-14]http://zhengwu.Beijing.gov.cn/zwzt/ygIazj/t]]16697.htm.
  • 7Jian W, Huang Y, Hu M, et al. Performance evaluation of inpa- tient service in Beijing: a horizontal comparison with risk ad- justment based on Diagnosis Related Groups[EB/OL]. BMC Health Services Research 2009, 9:72 [2009-04-01]. http:// www. biomedcentral, com/1472-6963/9/72/.
  • 8Kattcy E. Two decades of casm:ix-Department of Health and Age- ing [ EB/OL]. [2011-09-14]. http://www, healtK gov. au/inter- net/main/publishing, nsf/Content/.../Kathy?%Eagar, pps.
  • 9Iezzoni L. Risk adjustment for measuring health care outcomes [M]. 3rd ed. Chicago: Health Administration Press, 2003.
  • 10Grimaldi PL, Mieheletti JA. Diagnosis related groups: a racti-tioner's guide[M]. 2nd ed. Chicago:Pluribus Press, 1983.

共引文献172

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部