期刊文献+

马头山隧道设计方案分析与比选

Analysis and co MParison of design schemes for Matoushan tunnel
下载PDF
导出
摘要 单洞对向双车道长大隧道相较于分离式双向双车道隧道,洞内发生事故时由于缺少逃生通道往往会造成更严重的后果。显然双洞方案会付出更高的经济成本,但对于运营安全和缓解交通压力有更大贡献。通过对马头山隧道单洞对向双车道、分离式双洞双向四车道两个设计方案的分析比选,为类似项目设计方案提供参考。 The lack of an escape route in the event of an accident in a double-lane tunnel is often more serious than in a separate double-lane tunnel.Obviously,the double-hole solution will cost more economically,but it will contribute more to operational safety and traffic relief.In this paper,through the analysis and co MParison of the two design schemes of single tunnel to two lanes and separated double tunnel to four lanes,it provides reference for similar projects.
作者 孙鹏 SUN Peng(Shanxi Provincial Survey&Design Institute of Communications Co.,Ltd.)
出处 《黑龙江交通科技》 2020年第12期153-154,共2页 Communications Science and Technology Heilongjiang
关键词 马头山隧道 单洞对向双车道 分离式双洞双向四车道 防灾救援通道 设计方案比选 Matoshan tunnel single hole opposite to the dual lane separated double hole two-way four lanes disaster prevention and rescue channel design options
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部