期刊文献+

Evaluating the robustness of image matting algorithm

下载PDF
导出
摘要 In this study,the authors propose a method to calculate the consistency of alpha masking to assess the robustness of the matting algorithm.This study evaluates consistent alpha masks based on the Gaussian-Hermite moment in combination with gradient amplitude and gradient direction.The gradient direction describes the appearance and shape of local objects in the image,and the gradient amplitude accurately reflects the contrast and texture changes of small details in the image.They selected Gaussian blur,pretzel noise,and combined noise to destroy the image,and then evaluated the consistency of the original alpha mask and noise alpha mask.To determine the robustness of the matting algorithm,they assessed the degree of consistency of the alpha mask using three different evaluation levels.The experimental results show that noise has a greater impact on the performance of the matting algorithm,which shows a decreasing trend as the noise level in the image deepens.In noisy images,the traditional matting algorithm exhibits better robustness compared to the recently proposed trap matting algorithm.Different matting algorithms present different adaptations to different noises.
出处 《CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology》 EI 2020年第4期247-259,共13页 智能技术学报(英文)
基金 supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(61772319,61773244,61976125,61976124) Shandong Natural Science Foundation of China(ZR2017MF049) Yantai Key Research and Development Plan(2019XDHZ081).
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献66

  • 1王涛,高新波,张都应.一种基于内容的图像质量评价测度[J].中国图象图形学报,2007,12(6):1002-1007. 被引量:15
  • 2黄小乔,石俊生,杨健,姚军财.基于色差的均方误差与峰值信噪比评价彩色图像质量研究[J].光子学报,2007,36(B06):295-298. 被引量:24
  • 3朱里,李乔亮,张婷,汪国有.基于结构相似性的图像质量评价方法[J].光电工程,2007,34(11):108-113. 被引量:26
  • 4WANG Zhou,BOVIK A C. Modern image quality assessment[M].New York:Morgan and Claypool Publishing Company,2006.20-30.
  • 5WANG Zhou,BOVIK A C,SHEIKH H R. Image quality assessment:from error visibility to structural similarity[J].IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,2004,(04):600-612.
  • 6AVCIBAS I,SANBUR B,SAYOOD K. Statistical evaluation of image quality measures[J].JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC IMAGING,2002,(02):206-213.
  • 7GIROD B. What's wrong with mean-squared error[A].Cambridge:The MIT Press,1993.207-220.
  • 8ESKICIOGLU A M,FISHER P S. Image quality measures and their performance[J].IEEE Transactions on Communications,1995,(12):2959-2965.
  • 9LI Bei,MEYER W,KLASSEN V R. A comparison of two image quality models[A].San Jose:SPIE Digital Library,1998.98-109.
  • 10DAMERA-VENKATA N,KITE T D,GEISLER W S. Image quality assessment based on a degradation model[J].IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,2000,(04):636-650.

共引文献79

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部