期刊文献+

考虑异质性的经典随机后悔最小化模型改进研究 被引量:1

Improvement of Classic Random Regret Minimization Model Considering Heterogeneity
下载PDF
导出
摘要 传统基于后悔理论的交通行为模型对异质性考虑不充分,对真实选择行为的解释存在不足.本文利用韦伯比率,考虑出行者对各方式属性变量感知的异质性,对经典随机后悔最小化模型进行改进,分别建立基于随机效用最大化,经典随机后悔最小化和改进经典随机后悔最小化的选择模型;以网约车选择行为为例进行实证研究,验证改进模型效果.结果表明:3种模型参数标定结果具有一致性,改进模型的拟合优度(0.271)和命中率(75.8%)相较于另外两个模型均较优;改进模型能更好地描述多维属性决策过程中的半补偿原则和折中效应,可以提高模型对真实选择行为的解释能力. Due to the lack of consideration of heterogeneity in the traditional choice model based on regret theory,there may be errors in the interpretation of the real choice behavior.This paper uses the Weber ratio to consider the heterogeneity of travelers'perception for attribute variable to improve the classic random regret minimization model,and takes taxi-hailing choice behavior as an empirical study.Three choice models are established based on the random utility maximization,classic random regret minimization,and improved classic random regret minimization,respectively.The results suggest that the calibration results of the three models are consistent,and the improved model's goodness of fit(0.271)and hit ratio(75.8%)are both better compared with the other two models.Besides,the improved model can better describe the semi-compensation principle and compromise effect in the multidimensional attribute decision-making process.And the improved model has a strong explanatory capability to the real choice behavior.
作者 杨飞 侯宗廷 周涛 YANG Fei;HOU Zong-ting;ZHOU Tao(School of Transportation and Logistics,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 611756,China;Chongqing Transport Planning Institute,Chongqing 401147,China)
出处 《交通运输系统工程与信息》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2020年第6期191-196,共6页 Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金(51678505,52072313) 中铁二院工程集团有限责任公司科技开发计划项目(KYY2019028(19-20)).
关键词 交通工程 出行行为分析 异质性 随机效用最大化 随机后悔最小化 traffic engineering travel behavior analysis heterogeneity random utility maximization random regret minimization
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献15

  • 1ARENTZE T, TIMMERMANS H. Parametric action deci- sion-marking trees: incorporating continuous attribute vari- ables into rule based models of discrete choice[J]. Transpor tation Research Part B, Methodological, 2007, 41 (7): 772-783.
  • 2BELL D E. Regret in decision making under uncertainty[J]. Operations Research, 1982, 30(5): 961 -981.
  • 3ZHANG Jun-yi, TIMMERMANS H, BORGERS A, et al. Modeling traveler choice behavior using the concepts of rela- tive utility and relative interest[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2004, 38(3): 215-234.
  • 4GILBRIDE T J, ALLENBY G M. A choice model with con- junctive, disjunctive, and compensatory screening rules[J]. Marketing Science, 2004, 23(3): 391-406.
  • 5HESS S, STATHOPOULOS A, DALY A, Mixing of behavior processes: a modeling framework and three case-studies[C]// TRB. 90th Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board. Washington DC: TRB, 2011: 1-18.
  • 6DENANT-BOEMONT L, PETIOT R. Information value and sequential decision-making in a transport setting: an experi mental study[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodo logical, 2003, 37(4): 365-386.
  • 7LEONG W, HENSHER D A. Embedding decision heuristics in discrete choice models: a review[J]. Transport Reviews, 2012, 32(3): 313-331.
  • 8ARENTZE T A, TIMMERMANS H J P. ALBATROSS overview of the model, application and experiences[C]// TRB. Innovation in Travel Modeling 2008. Portland: TRB, 2008 1 -27.
  • 9JOU R C, KITAMURA R, WENG M C, et al. Dynamic commuter departure time choice under uncertainty[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2008, 42(5) : 774-783.
  • 10HANNES E, JANSSENS D, WETS G. Mental map of daily activity travel routines[C]//TRB. 88th Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board. Washington DC: TRB, 2009: 1-17.

共引文献10

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部