期刊文献+

程序公平感与员工知识隐藏:群体卷入模型的视角 被引量:2

Procedural Justice and Employee Knowledge Hiding:the Perspective of the Group Engagement Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 员工知识分享在组织中至关重要,但是组织中普遍存在的知识隐藏行为给组织带来了严重的经济损失。尽管已有研究探讨了知识隐藏的影响因素以及形成机制,但是关于公平因素的前因研究并不多。鉴于此,以社会认同理论下的群体卷入模型为理论框架,探讨程序公平感为何能够影响员工的知识隐藏行为,研究关注团队认同的中介效应和团队成员交换的调节效应。研究结果表明:程序公平感对知识隐藏有显著的负向影响;团队认同在其中起到部分中介作用;团队成员交换不仅调节了程序公平感和团队认同之间的关系,也调节了团队认同在程序公平感和知识隐藏之间的中介作用。研究结论揭示了程序公平感对知识隐藏的影响效应和作用路径,充实了知识隐藏行为的理论研究。 Employee knowledge sharing is very important in the organization,but there is more knowledge hiding in the organization,which will bring serious economic losses to the organization.Although existing studies have explored the influencing factors and formation mechanisms of knowledge hiding,there are not many studies on the causes of equity.In view of this,this paper takes the group engagement model under the social identity theory as the theoretical framework to explore why the procedural fairness can affect the knowledge hiding behavior of employees,and the research focuses on the mediating effect of team identification and the moderating effect of team-member exchange.The results show that the sense of fairness has a significant negative impact on knowledge hiding;team identification plays a part in mediating;team-member exchange not only moderates the relationship between procedural fairness and team identification,but also moderates the mediating role of team identification between procedural fairness and knowledge hiding.Therefore,this paper reveals the influence effect and mechanism path of procedural fairness on knowledge hiding,and enriches the theoretical literature research of knowledge hiding behavior.
作者 赵红丹 周晓敏 ZHAO Hongdan;ZHOU Xiaomin(School of Management,Shanghai University,Shanghai 200444,China)
出处 《上海管理科学》 2020年第6期91-99,共9页 Shanghai Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(71772116)。
关键词 知识隐藏 群体卷入模型 程序公平感 团队认同 团队成员交换 knowledge hiding the group engagement model procedural fairness team identification team-member exchange
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献132

  • 1温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,刘红云.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004,36(5):614-620. 被引量:7504
  • 2周浩,龙立荣.共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):942-950. 被引量:3586
  • 3刘惠琴,张德.高校学科团队中魅力型领导对团队创新绩效影响的实证研究[J].科研管理,2007,28(4):185-191. 被引量:52
  • 4Cobb, A. T., Vest, M., & Hills, F. (1997). Who delivers justice?: source perceptions of procedural fairness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1021 - 1040.
  • 5Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spcctor, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: a meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278-321.
  • 6Colquilt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O., & Ng, K. (2001). Justice at the millennium: a recta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425-445.
  • 7De Cremer, D. (2002). Respect and cooperation in social dilemmas: the importance of feeling included, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1335-1341.
  • 8De Cremer, D., & Blader, S. L. (2006). Why do people care about procedural fairness? The importance of belongingness in responding and attending to procedures. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 211-228.
  • 9De Cremer, D., & Tyler, T. R. (2007). The effects of trust in authority and procedural fairness on cooperation. Journal of Applied Psychology Copyright, 92, 639-649.
  • 10Edwards, M. R. (2009). HR , perceived organisational support and organisational identification: an analysis after organisational formation. Human Resource Management Journal,19, 91-115.

共引文献106

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部