引渡案件中不判处死刑承诺相关问题研究

Research on the Issues of Commitment Not to Impose Death Penalty in Extradition Cases

随着全球共同治理和反腐败追逃追赃的全面深入推进,不判处死刑承诺作为引渡的必要条件越来越普遍,同时暴露出一些新的问题。基于引渡和不判处死刑承诺制度的沿革、中外不判处死刑制度的规定和实践案例的分析,不判处死刑承诺相关制度有必要进一步完善。建议对引渡事实的审查机制和程序予以完善,对不判处死刑承诺决定形成的机制和流程以及作出承诺的形式予以明确,对不合时宜的双边引渡条约条款及时进行修正,适时调整《引渡法》等相关法律规定中关于不判处死刑承诺法律效力的表述,并在裁判文书中阐明不判处死刑承诺事由和援引相关法律条文。

With the all-round further advance of global governance and anticorruption efforts to chase fugitives and recover assets,the commitment not to impose the death penalty as a necessary condition for extradition has become more and more common,and some new problems have emerged.Based on the evolution of the system of extradition and commitment not to impose the death penalty,the analysis of the provisions and practical cases of the system of commitment not to impose the death penalty at home and abroad,it is necessary to further improve the relevant system of commitment not to impose the death penalty.So the paper puts forward the proposal that improving and perfecting the review mechanisms and procedures of extradition fact,defining the mechanism and procession of making commitment not to impose the death penalty as well as it’s form,making amendment of the inappropriate bilateral extradition treaty provisions timely,adjusting the expression of force of the extradition laws and other relevant laws and regulations concerning the commitment not to impose the death penalty,and clarifying the reasons for the commitment not to impose the death penalty and quoting the relevant legal provisions in the written judgment.