期刊文献+

错误信息效应的主要理论与影响因素的述评与展望 被引量:1

Review and Prospect on the Theories and Influence Factors of the Misinformation Effect
下载PDF
导出
摘要 个体对原始信息的记忆受到随后错误信息的影响而产生错误记忆被称为错误信息效应。通过对新近研究的梳理与归纳,发现错误信息效应的研究热点集中于解释效应产生机制的理论研究以及效应的影响因素研究。因此,本文重点归纳和述评了错误信息效应的五种理论和三类影响因素。未来的研究建议从以下几方面开展:第一,错误信息产生机制和理论研究;第二,探讨错误信息效应的年龄特点以及脑老化的影响;第三,分别创设现实情境与网络虚拟情境,探讨不同情境中错误信息效应的产生过程;第四,利用脑电和脑成像技术探讨错误信息效应的脑机制,为检验理论提供认知神经生物学的证据。 Memory of the original information is affected by subsequent misinformation and then produces a false memory is known as the misinformation effect.Thus,this article makes a comment on five theories and three types of influence factors about misinformation effect.Next,future research on the misinformation effect is introduced:First,research on the generation mechanism and theory of misinformation.Second,to discuss the age characteristics of misinformation effect and the influence of brain aging.Third,setting up the real situation and the network virtual situation respectively to discuss the generation process of the misinformation effect in different situations.Fourth,the brain mechanism of misinformation effect is explored by using the technology of EEG and Brain imaging,which also provides evidence of cognitive neurobiology for testing theories.
作者 王析蕾 贾宁 WANG Xilei;JIA Ning(College of Education,Hebei Normal University,Shijiazhuang 050024,China)
出处 《心理技术与应用》 2021年第1期52-64,共13页 Psychology(Techniques and Applications)
基金 河北省教育厅科学技术研究项目(QN2018152)。
关键词 错误信息效应 主要理论 影响因素 misinformation effect main theories influence factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献29

  • 1郭秀艳,李荆广.误导信息干扰引发的错误记忆研究[J].心理科学,2007,30(4):814-819. 被引量:8
  • 2Gabbert, F., Memon, A., & Allan, K. (2003) . Memory conformity: Can eyewitnesses influence each other's memories for an event? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 533-543.
  • 3Gabbert, F., Memon, A., Allan, K., & Wright, D. B. (2004) . Say it to my face: Examining the effects of socially encountered misinformation. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9 (2) , 215-227.
  • 4Helen, M., & Richard, H. (2006) . Comparing Methods of Encountering Post-event Information: The Power of Co-witness Suggestion. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1083-1099.
  • 5Johnson, K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
  • 6Loftus, E. F, & Palmer, J. (1974) . Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 585--589.
  • 7Meade, M. L., & Roediger, H. L. (2002) . Explorations in the social contagion of memory. Memory and Cognition, 30 (7) , 995-1009.
  • 8Paterson, H. M., & Kemp, R. I (2006a) . Co-witnesses talk: A survey of eye-witness discussion. Psychology,, Crime & Law, Apr, 12 (2) , 181-191.
  • 9Paterson, H. M., & Kemp, R. I. (2006b) . Comparing methods of encountering post-event information: the power of co-witness suggestion. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1083-1099.
  • 10Paterson, H. M, & Kemp, R. L (2011) . Combating Co-witness contami-nation: Attempting to deerease the negative effects of discussion on eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 43-52.

共引文献8

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部