末梢血与静脉血在血常规检验中的临床效果对比

Clinical Effect of Peripheral Blood and Venous Blood in Routine Blood Test

目的对末梢血与静脉血在血常规检验中的临床效果进行探讨。方法对象选取为102例进行血常规检验的患者,选自2018年6月—2019年8月期间,采用随机盲选法将患者平均分为两组进行实验,即观察组与对照组,每组各51例,前者采用静脉血实施检查,后者采用末梢血实施检查,对比两组各项指标检查结果。结果研究结果显示,观察组白细胞计数及血红蛋白低于对照组(P<0.05);血小板计数及红细胞计数高于对照组(P<0.05);两组中间细胞组间对比分析差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组CV、MHC及MCHC值与对照组比较,明显更低(P<0.05)。结论在血常规检验中,采集静脉血进行检查与末梢血比较,前者准确率更高;末梢血采集易受外界因素影响,静脉血采血量大,且不易受外界因素影响,不易掺杂组织液,因此,进行血常规检验时,建立临床采集静脉血,对于疾病的诊断及治疗优势更显著。

Objective To investigate the clinical effect of peripheral blood and venous blood in routine blood test.Methods 102 patients with routine blood test from June 2018 to August 2019 were selected as the research objects.The patients were divided into two groups by random blind selection method,that is,the observation group and the control group,with 51 cases in each group.The former used venous blood for examination,and the latter used peripheral blood for examination.The results of each index were compared between the two groups.Results The white blood cell count and hemoglobin in the observation group were lower than those in the control group(P<0.05).The platelet count and red blood cell count were higher than the control group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).CV,MHC and MCHC values in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Venous blood is more accurate than peripheral blood in routine blood test.Peripheral blood collection is easy to be affected by external factors,and venous blood collection is large,and not easy to be affected by external factors and not easy to be mixed with tissue fluid.Therefore,the establishment of clinical venous blood collection in routine blood testing has more significant advantages in the diagnosis and treatment of diseases.