摘要
为了解河南省兽医系统实验室检测能力和水平,科学评价各级实验室监测预警和风险评估能力,2018—2020年河南省动物疫病预防控制中心对全省18个省辖市、10个省直管县/市和117个县/区级兽医实验室组织开展了各省辖市、直管县/市和各县/区兽医实验室检测能力比对。结果显示:2018—2020年各省辖市检测结果平均正确率分别为97.30%、96.98%、95.28%,各直管县县/市检测结果平均正确率分别为93.05%、95.37%、84.57%,各县/区检测结果平均正确率分别为91.51%、91.26%、88.54%。结果表明全省大部分兽医实验室均已具备相应的检测能力,能够为河南省动物疫情风险评估及动物疫病预防控制体系提供有力支撑,但市县两级实验室检测水平存在一定差距。这提示基层实验室应完善实验室质量管理体系,强化生物安全管理体系建设,加强检测设备的补充升级,提升技术队伍专业水平。
In order to identify the detection capacity and performance of veterinary laboratories in Henan Province,and scientifically evaluate the capacities of monitoring,early warning and risk assessment of laboratories at all levels,the detection capacity of these laboratories was compared by Henan Center for Animal Disease Prevention and Control during 2018 to 2020,covering those at the levels of 18 provincial municipalities,10 provincial counties/cities and 117 counties/districts.The results showed that,during 2018 to 2019,the average accuracy rates of the laboratories at provincial municipality level were 97.30%,96.98%and 95.28%,successively,those at provincial county/city level were 93.05%,95.37%and 84.57%,successively,and those at county/district level were 91.51%,91.26%and 88.54%,successively.It was concluded that most veterinary laboratories had been equipped with corresponding detection capabilities,which could strongly support the risk assessment of animal diseases as well as the prevention and control system.In addition,the detection level of the laboratories at municipality and county levels was uneven,which indicated that,for grassroots laboratories,the laboratory management system of quality and bio-safety should be improved,test instruments should be supplemented or upgraded,and the professional skills of technical team should be improved.
作者
刘敏
程果
朱前磊
张利平
赵美雪
宋丹
闫若潜
Liu Min;Cheng Guo;Zhu Qianlei;Zhang Liping;Zhao Meixue;Song Dan;Yan Ruoqian(Henan Center for Animal Disease Prevention and Control,Zhengzhou,Henan 471000,China)
出处
《中国动物检疫》
CAS
2021年第1期57-60,86,共5页
China Animal Health Inspection
关键词
兽医实验室
检测能力
比对
风险评估
veterinary laboratory
detection capability
comparison
risk assessment