期刊文献+

小场地足球比赛对专项体能影响研究:系统评价、影响因素及研究展望 被引量:11

Research on the Influence of small-sided games on Physical Fitness:systematic review,influencing factors and research prospects
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:系统评价小场地足球比赛(Small-sided games,SSG)负荷的影响因素及其专项体能训练效果。方法:检索Pubmed、EBSCOHost、Web of Science、中国知网数据库中关于SSG对体能影响的研究,检索期限均从各数据库收录起始至2020年6月15日,按照纳入和排除标准筛选文献并提取数据,采用PEDro量表对纳入文献进行方法学质量评价。研究表明:SSG对专项体能的影响取决于比赛人数、场地大小、自由球员、练习时间和休息时长等因素;通过对比赛人数、场地大小、练习时间和间歇时长等因素的合理控制,SSG能够成为显著提升足球运动员有氧能力的有效手段,但无氧能力提升方面效果仍待进一步确定;SSG练习时,建议在面积较小的场地安排比赛,对阵人数为3v3、规定1次触球、要求人盯人防守、强调持球时间为主以及得分方式为停球至底线,以达到提升专项体能的效果。 This article systematically evaluated the influencing factors of the load of small-sided games(SSG)and the effects of special physical training.Literature on Pubmed、EBSCOHost、Web of Science and CNKI were searched,the literature was screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria,and the data were extracted.evaluate the methodological quality of the included literature.The impact of SSG on specific physical fitness depends on factors such as the number of players,field size,free agents,practice time,and rest time.Among them,through reasonable control of factors such as the number of players,field size,practice time and interval time,SSG can It has become an effective means to significantly improve the aerobic capacity of football players,but the effect of improving the anaerobic capacity is still to be further determined.When practicing SSG,it is recommended to arrange the game on a small area,the number of players is 3 v3,and the requirement is 1 touch.Man-to-man defense,emphasis on holding the ball time and scoring method is to stop the ball to the bottom line,in order to achieve special physical fitness.
作者 韦理鹏 WEI Lipeng(Chengdu Sport University,Chengdu Sichuan 610041)
机构地区 成都体育学院
出处 《成都体育学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第6期113-119,共7页 Journal of Chengdu Sport University
关键词 小场地足球比赛 体能 系统评价 Small-sided games fitness systematic review
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献35

  • 1郭新峰,温泽淮,老膺荣,赖世隆.临床试验质量评价工具及其应用[J].中国循证医学杂志,2004,4(7):484-487. 被引量:34
  • 2刘建平.非随机研究的系统评价方法(一)[J].中国循证医学,2001,1(4):239-243. 被引量:73
  • 3刘建平,夏芸.中文期刊发表的中医药系统综述或Meta-分析文章的质量评价[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2007,27(4):306-311. 被引量:59
  • 4Porta M. Chief editor. A dictionary of epidemiology. Fifth Edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008: 217.
  • 5刘建平, 主编. 循证中医药研究方法. 第1版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2009: 298-299.
  • 6Moher D, Soeken K, Sampson M, et al . Assessing the quality of reports of systematic reviews in pediatric complementary and alternative medicine. BMC Pediatr , 2002, 2(2): 1-3.
  • 7Jadad A, Moher M, Browman G, et al . Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: critical evaluation. BMJ , 2000, 321(7256): 537-540.
  • 8Jadad AR, Cook DJ, Jones A. Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analysis: a comparison of Cochrane paper-based journals. JAMA , 1998, 280(3): 278-280.
  • 9Shea B, Dubé C, Moher D. Assessing the quality of reports of systematic reviews: the QUOROM statement compared to other tools. In: Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-analysis in context. Edited by: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG. London: BMJ books, 2001: 122-139.
  • 10Oxman AD. Checklists for review articles. BMJ , 1994, 309(6955): 648-651.

共引文献430

同被引文献48

引证文献11

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部