期刊文献+

社会整体性的表征:卡勒“理论”的生产性

The Representation of Social Integrity:The Productbility of Kahler’s “Theory”
原文传递
导出
摘要 关于"理论",乔纳森·卡勒做过若干界定,解释性是其特性之一。"理论"的反思性、批判性恰恰是通过其解释性而实现的。在卡勒那里,文化研究与"理论"是两个可以相互置换的概念。这两者产生于文学研究但却挤压和排斥了文学研究,从而实现了方法论的转变,将文学解释为社会整体性的表征。于是对文学对象的阅读就有了诗学模式/解释学模式、恢复解释学/怀疑解释学、表征性解释/症候性解释等一系列不同类型、不同层次的区分。本文通过对于这些错综复杂、欲理还乱的关系的厘定和归置,揭示了"理论"作为一种人文学科的新文类,具有显著的观念生产、知识增长和学术建构的功效。 Jonathan Keller has made several definitions about"theory"and the explanatory nature,by which the reflective and critical nature of"theory"is achieved precisely,is one of its characteristics.From Kahler’s point of view,cultural studies and"theory"are two interchangeable concepts,both originating from literary research but squeezing and rejecting it,which makes the transformation of methodology realized and interprets literature as a sign of social integrity.Therefore,the reading of literary objects has a series of distinctions of different types and different levels,such as poetic mode/hermeneutics mode,hermeneutics of restoration/hermeneutics of suspicion,and representational interpretation/symptomatic interpretation,etc.Through the clarification and collocation of these intricate and chaotic relationships,this article reveals that"theory",as a new genre of humanities,has significant effects in promoting concept production,knowledge growth and academic construction.
作者 姚文放 YAO Wenfang
机构地区 扬州大学文学院
出处 《学术月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第11期142-149,共8页 Academic Monthly
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目“作为‘艺术生产’的文学批评研究”(17ZDA271)的阶段性成果。
关键词 卡勒 理论 生产性 社会整体性 表征 Kahler theory productbility social integrity representation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献8

  • 1Lawrence Grossberg,Cary Nelson,and Paula Treichler eds.,Cultural Studies,New York:Routledge,1992,p.4,p.4,p.5,p.6,p.4.
  • 2Stuart Hall,“Cultural Studies:Two Paradigms,”in Media,Culture,and Society,1980,pp.57-72.
  • 3Jonathan Culler,Framing the Sign:Criticism and Its Institutions,Oxford:Blackwell,1988,pp.3-40,pp.168-182,pp.153-167.
  • 4Lévi-Strauss,Mythologiques,vol.1,Paris:Plon,1964,p.4.
  • 5Roland Barthes,S/Z,Paris:Seuil,1970,p.20.
  • 6Roland Barthes,"Reflexions sur un Manuel," in Serge Doubrovsky and Tzvetan Todorov eds.,Serge L'enseignement de la Littérature,Paris:Plon,1969,p.170.
  • 7William Readings,The University in Ruins in Cambridge,Mass:Harvard University Press,1996,p.77,pp.21-43,p.9.
  • 8E.D.Hirsch,Cultural Literacy:What Every American Needs to Know,Boston:Houghton Mifflin,1987.

共引文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部