异质性减排政策下考虑成本分担和收益分享的供应链契约研究

Research on Supply Chain Contract Considering Cost Proportioning and Revenue Sharing under Heterogeneous Emission Reduction Policies

异质性减排政策下研究供应链协调问题,有助于缓解企业间矛盾,促进低碳经济的发展。以一个供应商和一个制造商组成二级供应链为例,构建stackelberg决策模型,分别讨论了不同契约下供应商和制造商的最优决策,并对成本分担契约和收益分享契约进行了比较分析,研究表明:成本分担契约相较于收益共享契约,产品销售价格和批发价格更高,且在企业减排方面更为突出;在企业利润方面,两者均能优化供应链,实现供应链的协调。

In this paper,with a two-echelon supply chain composed by one supplier and one manufacturer as example,we established a stackelberg decision model to examine the optimal decision of the supplier and the manufacturer under different contracts,and compared the effect of the cost proportioning contract and the revenue sharing contract.The result showed that compared with the revenue sharing contract,the cost proportioning contract has higher product sales prices and wholesale prices,and is more prominent in terms of corporate emissions reduction;while in terms of corporate profits,both are capable of optimizing and coordinating the supply chain.