摘要
本文探讨美国法与欧陆法对于价格挤压规范之本质与异同并发现:基于管制基本理念之不同,前者倾向自由放任,强调政府不应过度管制事业定价,以维护经济效率,进而提高投资与研发意愿。后者则偏向政府管制,以维护交易公平与社会正义。
This article investigates the differences between the regulations on price squeezes in the U.S.and the E.U.legal regimes.The evidence obtained shows that the former emphasizes laissez-faire and argues that the government should not intervene firm's pricing strategy in order to ensure economic efficiency.On the other hand,the latter emphasizes government regulation so as to preserve transaction fairness and social justice.
出处
《竞争政策研究》
2020年第6期93-106,共14页
Competition Policy Research
