论党内法规的制度边界

On the Rule’s Boundary of the Inner-Party Regulation of CPC

在法理学的视野里,任何一种规则都有制度边界,并由权利义务及其相关配置提供理论基础。党内法规也不例外,在其条款中,党组织和党员的义务在文本规定、逻辑关系、数量对比以及运行状态上都优先于权利,呈现出"义务本位"的基本属性,更强调对规则对象的约束,于是制度边界相较国家法律更显"扩张"。然而,所有义务都是有边界和限度的,与此相应,党内法规对党组织和党员的约束也存在边界和限度。党内法规的义务本位并不是"义务无限",制度边界也不是"无限扩张"。关于党内法规的制度边界的研究,主要是解决党组织和党员为何被约束以及在何种程度上被约束的问题,从而在学理上为避免"执纪问责简单化"提供支持,进而增进制度权威。

From the perspective of jurisprudence,any rule has the rule’s boundary.Within the rules,rights and obligations’configuration provides the theoretical basis.Inner-Party Regulation of CPC are no exception.In the Inner-Party Regulation,the obligations of party organizations and party members have priority over rights in terms of textual provisions,logical relationships,quantitative comparisons,and operational status,presenting the basic attributes of"obligation-based",and emphasizing on the constraints on the objects of the rules,so that the rule boundary are more"expanded"than national laws.However,all obligations have boundary and Limitation.Accordingly,there are also boundaries and limits on the constraints of Party organizations and Party members by Inner-Party Regulation.The obligation standard of Inner-Party Regulation is not"unlimited obligations".The rule s boundary is not"unlimited expansion".The research on the rule’s boundary of Inner-Party Regulation is mainly to solve the problem of why and to what extent Party organizations and Party members are constrained,in order to avoid the simplification of accountability in theory.It can improve the authority of the system.