期刊文献+

应用早期显微手术夹闭瘤颈治疗脑动脉瘤破裂出血的疗效探究

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨应用早期显微手术夹闭瘤颈治疗脑动脉瘤(CA)破裂出血的临床疗效。方法98例CA破裂出血患者,随机分为观察组与对照组,各49例。两组均行显微手术夹闭瘤颈术,观察组于发病72h内进行,对照组于发病72h后择期进行。比较两组各项手术指标、预后优良率、死亡率、并发症发生率、术后14d的蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)评分。结果观察组手术时间(3.86±1.02)h、住院时间(13.09±3.27)d、术中出血量(75.64±12.73)ml与对照组的(3.97±0.98)h、(12.87±2.79)d、(76.21±14.01)ml比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组预后优良率87.76%明显高于对照组的71.43%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组死亡率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组并发症发生率为10.20%,与对照组的14.29%比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组术后14d的视觉与执行功能、注意力、语言、定向、延迟回忆以及MoCA总分均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组命名、抽象评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论早期显微手术夹闭瘤颈治疗CA破裂出血的应用效果显著,能明显改善预后,有助于减轻认知功能障碍,促进认知功能的恢复,且不增加并发症发生率,具有积极的临床意义。
作者 文平 张宁
出处 《中国实用医药》 2020年第36期60-62,共3页 China Practical Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金(项目编号:81660214) 内蒙古科技厅科技计划项目(项目编号:201702101)。
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献140

  • 1韩志光,李深誉.颅内前循环动脉瘤夹闭术中破裂的危险因素及预后分析[J].世界临床医学,2017,11(15):68-69. 被引量:3
  • 2Chang W, Huang M, Chien A. Emerging techniques for evaluation of the hemodynamics of intracranial vascular pathology [J]. Neuroradiol J, 2015, 28: 19-27.
  • 3Chang SI, Tsai MD, Wei CP. Posterior communicating anenrysm with oculomotor nerve palsy: clinical outcome niter aneurysm clipping [J]. Turk Nenrosurg, 2014, 24: 170-173.
  • 4Liu HM, Wong HF, Lee KW, et al. Taiwan aneurysm registry: multivari- ate analysis of two-month, one-year, and two-year outcomes after endovas- cular and microsurgieal treatment of ruptured aneurysms [J]. Interv Neuroradiol, 2013, 19: 35-42.
  • 5Eto A, Nakai K, Aikawa H, et al. Unruptured cerebral aneurysm associ- ated with fenestration of the anterior cerebral artery successfully treated with coil embolization using an intracranial stent: a case report [J]. No Shinkei Geka, 2015, 43: 75-78.
  • 6Bor AS, Niemansburg SL, Wermer MJ, et al. Anosmia after coiling of ruptured aneurysms: prevalence, prognosis, and risk factors[J]. Stroke, 2009, 40: 2226-2228.
  • 7Molyneux A J, Birks J, Clarke A, et al. The durability of endovascular coiling versus neurosurgieal clipping of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: 18 year follow-up of the UK cohort of the International Subarachnoid A- neurysm Trial (ISAT)[J]. Lancet, 2015, 385: 691-697.
  • 8Standhardt H, Boecher-Sehwarz H, Gruber A, et al. Endovascular treat- ment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with CJuglielmi detachable coils: short- and long-term results of a single-centre series [J]. Stroke, 2008, 39: 899-904.
  • 9Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM, et al. International subarachnoid a- neurysm trial (ISAT) ofneurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised compar- ison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion[J]. Lancet, 2005, 366: 809-819.
  • 10Taheri Z, Harirchian MH, Ghanaati H, et al. Comparison of endovascu- lar coiling and surgical dipping for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A prospective study[J]. Iran J Neurol, 2015, 14: 22-28.

共引文献175

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部