期刊文献+

曲美他嗪联合经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对冠心病的近期疗效及安全性分析 被引量:9

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨曲美他嗪联合经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)对冠心病的近期疗效及安全性。方法纳入2016年1月~2018年1月于我院确诊的冠心病患者100例,根据数字表法将患者随机分为观察组(PCI+曲美他嗪治疗)50例和对照组(PCI)50例,两组均连续治疗4周。检测两组患者治疗前后血液流变学指标[包括全血高切黏度(HBV)、全血低切黏度(LBV)、血浆黏度(PV)、纤维蛋白原(FIB)]、可溶性CD40受体(sCD40L)及超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)水平;采用运动试验(Bruce方案)评估患者恢复情况;同时记录两组患者心血管不良事件的发生率,并比较两组患者的疗效。结果观察组患者总有效率(94.0%,47/50)高于对照组(80.0%,40/50),差异有统计学意义(χ2=9.525,P=0.01)。两组患者治疗前HBV、LBV、PV、FIB及血清sCD40L、hs-CRP水平比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后两组患者HBV、LBV、PV、FIB及血清sCD40L、hs-CRP水平均低于同组治疗前(P<0.05),且治疗后观察组上述指标均低于对照组(P<0.05)。对照组和观察组心血管不良事件的总发生率比较差异无统计学意义(50%比32%,P>0.05)。治疗后观察组患者Bruce方案中的运动时间长于对照组,自觉健康恢复患者比例高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论曲美他嗪联合PCI对冠心病的临床疗效较好,其心血管不良事件的发生率较低。
出处 《临床内科杂志》 CAS 2020年第12期869-871,共3页 Journal of Clinical Internal Medicine
基金 湖北省科技厅科研项目(2018CFB537)。
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献45

  • 1心肌病诊断与治疗建议[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(1):5-16. 被引量:547
  • 2Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery ( EACTS ), European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), Wijns W, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J,2010 , 31:2501-2555.
  • 3Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/ SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines and the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions. Circulation, 2011, 124 :e574-651.
  • 4Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2011,58 :e123-210.
  • 5Nashef SA, Roques F, Michel P, et al. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation ( EuroSCORE ). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 1999,16:9-13.
  • 6Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med, 2009,360:961- 972.
  • 7Peterson ED, Dai D, DeLong ER, et al. Contemporary mortality risk prediction for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 588,398 procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. J Am Coil Cardiol,2010,55:1923-1932.
  • 8Online STS fish calculator [ S/OL]. [ 2012-01-01 ]. http:// riskcalc, sts. org/STSWebRiskCalc273/de, aspx.
  • 9Mehta SR, Tanguay JF, Eikelboom JW, et al. Double-dose versus standard-dose clopidogrel and high-dose versus low-dose aspirin in individuals undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes ( CURRENT-OASIS 7 ): a randomised factorial trial. Lancet,2010,376 : 1233-1243.
  • 10Mehta SR, Granger CB, Eikelboom JW, et al. Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the OASIS-5 trial. J Am Cell Cardiol,2007,50 : 1742-1751.

共引文献455

同被引文献90

引证文献9

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部