期刊文献+

基于蒙特卡洛模拟的多米诺事故风险量化管理 被引量:5

Risk quantification management of domino accidents based on Monte Carlo simulation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为降低危化品相关的化工事故造成的人员伤亡和财产损失,以化工多米诺事故为研究对象,探讨由初始事故引发1个或多个次生事故的连锁反应机理与风险评估方法。提出应用蒙特卡洛模拟对多米诺事故风险进行动态量化的方法,梳理化工多米诺事故风险的识别、分析、评定、处理全周期管理流程,并以1个天然气压气站为案例,验证基于蒙卡模拟的化工多米诺事故风险量化方法的有效性。结果表明:该方法可以更准确地对化工多米诺事故风险进行定量评估。多米诺事故风险全周期管理流程的梳理能够有效指导化工企业开展安全管理、事故预防等工作。 In order to reduce the casualties and property losses caused by the chemical accidents related to hazardous chemicals,the chemical domino accidents were taken as the research object to explore the chain reaction mechanism and risk assessment methods of one or more secondary accidents caused by the initial accident.A method of applying Monte Carlo simulation to dynamically quantify the risk of domino accidents was put forward,and the full-cycle management process of identifying,analyzing,assessing,and dealing with the risk of chemical domino accidents was sorted out.A natural gas compressor station was used as a case to verify the effectiveness of risk quantification method for the chemical domino accidents based on the Monte Carlo simulation.The results showed that the method could quantitatively assess the risk of chemical domino accidents more accurately.The sorting of the full-cycle management process of domino accident risk can effectively guide the chemical enterprises to carry out the safety management,accident prevention,etc.
作者 贺治超 毕先志 翁文国 HE Zhichao;BI Xianzhi;WENG Wenguo(Institute of Public Safety Research,Department of Engineering Physics,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China;Tianjin Gas Transmission Management Office of PetroChina Beijing Gas Pipeline Co.,Ltd.,Tianjin 301799,China)
出处 《中国安全生产科学技术》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第12期11-16,共6页 Journal of Safety Science and Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(72034004,91846301)。
关键词 化工多米诺事故 蒙特卡洛模拟 风险量化 风险全周期管理 chemical domino accident Monte Carlo simulation risk quantification full-cycle risk management
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献36

  • 1陈国华,张静,张晖,颜伟文,陈清光.区域风险评价方法研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2006,16(6):112-117. 被引量:58
  • 2Hunter P R,Fewtrell L. Acceptable risk [A]. Water quality:Guidelines,standards and health [C]. London:IWA Publishing, 2001.207-227.
  • 3Aven T. On the ethical justification for the use of risk acceptance criteria[J]. Risk Analysis, 2007,27 (2) : 303-312.
  • 4Velokhin A N, Sizov Y I,Tshovrebov Y V. The criteria of acceptable risk in Russia[J]. Journal of Risk Research,2004,7(6):609-612.
  • 5Wigger P,Hovel R. Safety assessment-Application of CENELEC standards[A]. Proceedings of the metro inauguration seminar[C]. Copenhagen:Copenhagen Metro Inauguration Seminar, 2002.1-10.
  • 6Aven T A. Semi-quantitative approach to risk analysis,as an alternative to QPAs [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2008,93(6):768-775.
  • 7EM-DAT. Summarized Table of Natural Disasters in China P Repfrom 1980 to 2000[DB/OL]. http://www. emdat, be/Database/OisasterList/list, php, 2009-03-15.
  • 8ISDR. Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015:Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters[R].Kobe,Hyogo,Japan:World Conference on Disaster Reduction,2005.
  • 9Aven T,Vinnem J E,Wiencke H S. A decision framework for risk management,with application to the offshore oil and gas industry[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2007,92(4):433-448.
  • 10Fell R,Cororninas J, Bonnard C, etal. Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk-zoning for land use planning[J]. Engineering Geology,2008,102(3-4):85-98.

共引文献80

同被引文献39

引证文献5

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部