简式Barratt冲动量表中文版的信效度检验

Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Brief Barratt Impulsiveness Scale

目的:检验简式Barratt冲动性量表(Brief Barratt Impulsiveness Scale,BBIS)中文版的信度和效度。方法:用BBIS中文版对364名大学生和327名中学生施测,同时测定S-UPPS-P冲动行为量表及简式网络游戏障碍量表(IGDS9-SF)进行效标效度的验证。在中学生样本中抽取150人间隔四周后进行重测。结果:验证性因子分析结果支持两维度结构,各拟合度指标分别为:χ^2/df为3.66,P<0.001,NFI为0.97,CFI为0.98,IFI为0.98,TLI为0.97,RM⁃SEA为0.068。项目分析显示各条目与所属分量表及总量表得分均呈显著相关(r值=0.55~0.89,P<0.001)。中文版BBIS总量表及自控力差和冲动行为两个分量表的Cronbach’sα系数分别为0.85、0.88和0.80。总量表及两个分量表的重测信度为0.87、0.89和0.86。BBIS量表总分及两个维度得分与S-UPPS-P总量表分及其五个维度分以及IGDS9-SF总分均存在显著性相关(r=0.29~0.54,P<0.001)。结论:简式Barratt冲动性量表中文版具有良好的信效度,可以作为评估冲动性的工具。

Objective:To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Brief Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-Brief(BBIS).Methods:A sample of 364 college students and a sample of 327 middle school students were tested,in which 150 students were selected for re-test four weeks later.Meanwhile,The Short Version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale(S-UPPS-P)and Internet Gaming Disorder Scale-Short Form(IGDS9-SF)were selected as the criterion measure⁃ments.Results:The results of confirmatory factor analysis supported the two-factor structure model,and the fit indices wereχ^2/df=3.66,P<0.001,NFI=0.97,CFI=0.98,IFI=0.98,TLI=0.97,RMSEA=0.068,all meeting the criteria standards for adequacy of fit.The critical ratios of all the items in Chinese version of BBIS were significant(Ps<0.001).The correlation between each item and the score of total scale or subscale ranged from 0.55 to 0.89.The Cronbach’sαcoefficients of the to⁃tal scale,poor self-regulation,and impulsive behavior were 0.85,0.88,and 0.80,and the test-retest reliability after 4 weeks were 0.87,0.89,and 0.86 respectively.The total score and scores of the two factors of the Chinese version of BBIS showed significant positive correlation with the S-UPPS-P score and total score of IGDS9-SF(r=0.29~0.54,Ps<0.001).Conclusion:The Chinese version of BBIS has good reliability and validity,which can be used as a useful tool to research impulsiveness.