无创正压通气联合固尔苏治疗呼吸窘迫综合征的效果对比

Comparison of Effects of Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation Combined With Guersu in the Treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome

目的探究两种无创正压通气模式联合固尔苏治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的效果。方法选取我院2019年1月—2020年1月的70例新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征患儿进行研究,通过随机数字表法分组分为对照组和观察组,各35例,对照组患儿采用鼻塞式持续气道正压通气模式联合固尔苏治疗,观察组患儿采用双水平气道正压通气模式联合固尔苏治疗,观察两组治疗前后的各项临床指标情况。结果观察组患儿的各项治疗效果均优于对照组患儿(P<0.05),数据对比有统计学意义。结论采用双水平气道正压通气模式联合固尔苏治疗更有利于新生儿的治疗,整体恢复时间及有效性显著高于鼻塞式持续气道正压通气模式联合固尔苏治疗,值得广泛推广使用。

Objective To probe into the effect of two kinds of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation combined with curosurf in treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.Methods 70 cases of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome and who treated in our hospital from January 2019 to January 2020 were selected for research,and the patients were divided into the control group and the observation group by the random number table grouping methods,with 35 cases in each group.The control group were treated with nasal continuous positive airway pressure ventilation combined with curosurf,and the observation group were treated with bilevel positive airway pressure ventilation mode combined with curosurf.Then,the each clinical indicators before and after treatment were measured.Results The each clinical indicators in the observation group were higher than those in the control group(P<0.05),and the data comparison had statistical significance.Conclusion The bilevel positive airway pressure ventilation mode combined with curosurf is more conducive to the treatment of newborn,the overall recovery time and effectiveness is significantly higher than the nasal continuous positive airway pressure ventilation mode combined with gursu treatment,thus it is worth promoting and using widely.