不知情交付类案件的定性难题与解决思路

Qualitative Difficulties and Solutions of Uninformed Delivery Cases

不知情交付类案件的定性取决于如何理解诈骗罪中被害人的处分行为。作为通说的处分意识必要说,无论是其中的处分意识严格论还是缓和论,尚都存在诸多疑问。盗窃与诈骗在基本构造上的差异是有无被害人因素的介入。被害人因素的本质属性在于被害人过错。被害人过错从被害人角度体现为被害人处分,从行为人角度体现为被害人被利用。以行为人角度来看,处分意识不要说的方向总体值得提倡。在此基础上,盗窃与诈骗的区别在于,在被害人实施客观处分之前,行为人是否已经主动侵入了被害人的财产支配领域,改变了财产的本来状态,使得被害人最终的处分行为仅具有形式意义。以此为标准,不知情交付类案件的定性难题可以得到妥当解决。

The characterization of uninformed delivery cases depends on how to understand the punishment of the victim in the crime of fraud.As a general disposition consciousness,it is necessary to say that there are still many questions whether it is the strict disposition consciousness or the easing theory.The basic structure difference between theft and fraud is the presence or absence of victim factors.The essential attribute of the victim factor is the victim's fault.The victim's fault is reflected from the victim's perspective as the victim's punishment,and the perpetrator's perspective as the victim's use.From the perspective of the perpetrator,the direction that the consciousness of punishment should not be mentioned is generally worth promoting.On this basis,the difference between theft and fraud is whether the actor has actively invaded the realm of property control of the victim before the victim's objective punishment,changing the original state of the property,so that the final punishment of the victim has only superficial meaning.With this as a standard,the qualitative problems of cases of unintentional delivery can be properly solved.