摘要
洛阳周代成周的确定,至今仍没有共识,主要原因是没有找到成周的遗址。究竟周代洛阳是一个成周还是两个成周,目前仍在争论中。本文是两成周论,一个是西周成王欲建的成周,由周公完成;另一个是东周敬王要建的成周,由诸侯合力完成。两成周在春秋、战国的文献中共存,否定了一个成周说。本文采用逻辑推理,对周代史做深入梳理,引申已有的考古发现,将西周成周定位在瀍水西,今洛阳老城之下;将东周成周定位在汉魏故城的中部和北部城垣;还将与两成周相关的历史事件,并做了相应简述,以明其真实性。
There has been no consensus among scholars as to whether there was one Chengzhou city or two in Luoyang in the Zhou dynasty.The author believes that two Chengzhou cities were built:one by Duke Zhou and the other by King Jing of the Eastern Zhou with the help of the vassals.And through textual research,the author thinks the Western Zhou Chengzhou was located west of today’s Chanhe River,buried beneath the old Luoyang city,while the Eastern Zhou Chengzhou at the middle and north of the Han-Wei Luoyang city.
出处
《洛阳考古》
2020年第1期49-59,共11页
Archaeology of Luoyang
关键词
周代
洛阳
成周
Zhou dynasty
Luoyang
Chengzhou