期刊文献+

板式无砟轨道锚穴部位损伤分布研究 被引量:6

Damage Distribution at Anchor Pockets in Slab Track
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在列车荷载及环境因素的长期作用下,轨道板锚穴部位易产生裂纹,对轨道结构服役性能可能产生不利影响。本文介绍了轨道板预应力的张拉施工过程,并基于损伤力学与混凝土塑性损伤模型,建立了纵、横向预应力作用下的轨道板锚穴部位损伤分布模型,以最大主拉应力、压缩损伤因子及拉伸损伤因子为评价指标,分析了轨道板在预应力施加过程中锚穴部位裂纹损伤的分布状况。结果表明:预应力作用下,纵向锚穴部位最大主拉应力为2.47 MPa,相较于横向锚穴更容易产生初始裂纹损伤;预应力作用下,锚穴部位压缩损伤因子均不超过0.5,压缩损伤范围较拉伸损伤范围小;相较于横向锚穴,纵向锚穴部位拉伸损伤范围已基本扩散至轨道板上下表面,最大拉伸损伤因子可达0.9,应重点关注。 As a result of long-term exposure to train loads and environmental factors,the crack damage around anchor pockets in slab track will occur,which can adversely affect the mechanical performance of track structure.In this paper,the post-tensioning process of prefabricated track slab was introduced.Moreover,based on damage mechanics and the Concrete Damage Plasticity(CDP)model,the damage distribution model of anchor pockets under longitudinal and transverse pre-stress was established.In an attempt to study the crack damage distribution around anchor pockets during prestressing process,the maximum principal tensile stress,compression damage factors and tensile damage factors were selected as evaluation indexes.The results indicate that:the maximum principal tensile stress around longitudinal anchor pockets under the action of pre-stress is 2.47 MPa,which is more likely to cause initial crack damage than that of transverse anchor pockets.The compressive damage factors of anchor pockets under pre-stress are all less than 0.5,with the compressive damage area smaller than the tensile damage area.Compared with transverse anchor pockets,the tensile damage of longitudinal anchor pockets spread to the upper and lower surfaces of the track slab with the maximum tensile damage factor reaching 0.9,which should be highly focused on.
作者 任娟娟 李家乐 韦凯 邓世杰 王吉 徐家铎 REN Juanjuan;LI Jiale;WEI Kai;DENG Shijie;WANG Ji;XU Jiaduo(School of Traffic & Transportation Engineering, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha 410114, China;Key Laboratory of High-speed Railway Engineering, Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China;School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China;Hefei Track Division, China Railway Shanghai Group Co., Ltd., Hefei 230012, China)
出处 《铁道学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第12期113-119,共7页 Journal of the China Railway Society
基金 国家自然科学基金(52022085) 中国铁路设计集团有限公司科技开发课题(2020YY340120-1) 中国国家铁路集团有限公司科技研究开发计划(P2019G029) 四川省科技计划(2019YFG0001)。
关键词 板式无砟轨道 预应力锚穴 塑性损伤模型 最大主拉应力 损伤因子 slab track prestressed anchor pockets Concrete Damaged Plasticity model maximum principal tensile stress damage factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献37

  • 1刘振民,钱振地,张雷.双块式无砟轨道道床板混凝土裂缝的分析与防治[J].铁道建筑,2007,47(6):99-101. 被引量:42
  • 2ABAQUS Inc. Abaqus theory manual [M]. 2007.
  • 3ABAQUS Inc. Abaqus user's manual [ M]. 2007.
  • 4铁道部工程管理中心.客运专线铁路无砟轨道施工手册[M].北京:中国铁道出版社,2009.
  • 5Abdel Wahab MM,De Roeck G,Peeters B.Parameterization of Damage in Reinforced Concrete Structures Using Model Updating[J].Journal of Sound and Vibration,1999,228(4):717-730.
  • 6S S Law,X Q Zhu.Dynamic Behavior of Damaged Concrete Bridge Structures under Moving Vehicular Loads[J].Engineering Structures,2004,(26):1279-1293.
  • 7科技基[2008] 74号,客运专线铁路CRTSⅠ型板式无砟轨道混凝土轨道板暂行技术条件[S].
  • 8.混凝土结构设计规范(GB50010-2002)[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2002..
  • 9JOHN O H. The theory manual of LS-DYNA[M]. Livermore: Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2006: 24.1-24.12.
  • 10铁道部工程管理中心.京津城际轨道交通工程CRTSll型板式轨道技术总结报告[R].北京:铁道部工程管理中心,2008.

共引文献601

同被引文献163

引证文献6

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部