氩离子凝固术与高频电凝切除术治疗结肠息肉的效果比较

Comparison of Argon Plasma Coagulation and High Frequency Electrocoagulation in the Treatment of Colonic Polyps

目的研究内镜下氩离子凝固术与高频电凝切除术治疗结肠息肉的疗效差异。方法随机采取医院收治的100例结肠息肉患者的临床资料,入院时间2018年1月—2019年1月。对选取患者运用数字表法进行分组:对照组和观察组各有50例。其中,观察组患者采取内镜下氩离子凝固术治疗,对照组患者采取内镜下高频电凝切除术治疗。对两组患者的治疗结果进行观察和比较。结果观察组患者的息肉切除率、治疗总有效率明显高于对照组,且观察组患者的术后并发症发生率、复发率低于对照组。几项指标比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对结肠息肉患者运用内镜下氩离子凝固术治疗的效果相对优于高频电凝切除术,且患者术后并发症发生率低、复发率低。

Objective To study the difference of therapeutic effect between endoscopic argon coagulation and high frequency electrocoagulation in the treatment of colonic polyps.Methods The clinical data of 100 patients with colonic polyps in our hospital were randomly collected.The admission time was from January 2018 to January 2019.Patients were divided into control group and observation group with 50 cases each.Among them,the patients in the observation group were treated by endoscopic argon ion coagulation,while the patients in the control group were treated by endoscopic high-frequency electrocoagulation.The treatment results of the two groups were observed and compared.Results The rate of polypectomy and the total effective rate of treatment in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group,and the incidence of postoperative complications and recurrence in the observation group were lower than those in the control group.The difference of several indexes was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The effect of endoscopic argon coagulation is better than that of high-frequency electrocoagulation in the treatment of colonic polyps,and the incidence of postoperative complications is low,the recurrence rate is low.